Bolognese Manuel, Österreich Mareike, Müller Martin, von Hessling Alexander, Karwacki Grzegorz Marek, Lakatos Lehel-Barna
Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, Section Neuroradiology, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 10;15(4):633. doi: 10.3390/life15040633.
Acute ischemic stroke outcomes depend on various factors. We investigated whether the outcome-relevant factor (ORF) profiles differ between different vascular territories and different therapeutic strategies. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 410 comprehensive stroke center patients [median age of 70 years (IQR 57-80), 125 women (30%)] by analyzing five groups: all patients, patients with infratentorial infarctions only (n = 80), all patients with supratentorial infarctions (n = 330), patients with supratentorial infarctions without (n = 269), and with mechanical thrombectomy (n = 61). Outcomes were classified with the modified Rankin scale as ≤2 (good) or >2 (poor) after three months. The patient group with infratentorial strokes was compared to the group of patients with supratentorial strokes using the Kruskal-Wallis test or chi-squared statistics. Within each of the five stroke groups, univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the ORF of a poor outcome; if more than one ORF was identified, all identified factors were included in one multinomial logistic regression analysis model. Compared to the patients with supratentorial strokes, the patients with infratentorial stroke exhibited a less severe neurological deficit at entry and lower rates of ischemic heart disease, thrombolytic intervention, and cardio-embolism but a higher rate of large vessel disease. After multinomial logistic regression analysis, a poor outcome in the infratentorial group was associated with atrial fibrillation [odds ratio (OR) 13.73 (95% confidence interval 1.05-181.89), = 0.04], estimated glomerular filtration rate [OR 0.96 (0.91-0.99)], = 0.02], and marginally with diabetes mellitus [OR 7.69 (0.96-62.63), = 0.05]. In all three supratentorial stroke groups, the neurological deficit as scored by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [OR 1.32 (1.22-1.44), < 0.0001] was predominantly associated with a poor outcome, accompanied by age only in the group of all supratentorial strokes [OR 1.04 (1.01-1.08), = 0.01]. In this cohort of mild to moderate stroke patients, the ORFs differed between the supra- and infratentorial stroke populations.
急性缺血性卒中的预后取决于多种因素。我们研究了不同血管区域和不同治疗策略之间与预后相关的因素(ORF)谱是否存在差异。在这项回顾性研究中,我们通过分析五组患者对410例综合卒中中心的患者[中位年龄70岁(四分位间距57 - 80岁),125名女性(30%)]进行了分析:所有患者、仅幕下梗死患者(n = 80)、所有幕上梗死患者(n = 330)、无机械取栓的幕上梗死患者(n = 269)以及有机械取栓的幕上梗死患者(n = 61)。三个月后,使用改良Rankin量表将预后分为≤2(良好)或>2(不良)。使用Kruskal - Wallis检验或卡方统计量将幕下卒中患者组与幕上卒中患者组进行比较。在五个卒中组中的每一组内,使用单变量逻辑回归分析来确定不良预后的ORF;如果确定了多个ORF,则将所有确定的因素纳入一个多项逻辑回归分析模型。与幕上卒中患者相比,幕下卒中患者入院时神经功能缺损较轻,缺血性心脏病、溶栓干预和心源性栓塞的发生率较低,但大血管疾病的发生率较高。经过多项逻辑回归分析,幕下组不良预后与心房颤动[比值比(OR)13.73(95%置信区间1.05 - 181.89),P = 0.04]、估计肾小球滤过率[OR 0.96(0.91 - 0.99),P = 0.02]以及糖尿病呈边缘相关[OR 7.69(0.96 - 62.63),P = 0.05]。在所有三个幕上卒中组中,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的神经功能缺损[OR 1.32(1.22 - 1.44),P < 0.0001]主要与不良预后相关,仅在所有幕上卒中患者组中年龄也与之相关[OR 1.04(1.01 - 1.08),P = 0.01]。在这个轻度至中度卒中患者队列中,幕上和幕下卒中人群的ORF存在差异。