Brehmer Anton, Youssef Yasmin, Heilemann Martin, Wendler Toni, Fischer Jean-Pierre, Schleifenbaum Stefan, Hepp Pierre, Theopold Jan
Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
ZESBO-Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;15(4):658. doi: 10.3390/life15040658.
Anteroinferior shoulder dislocations require surgical intervention when related to critical glenoid bone loss. Scapular spine bone blocks have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional bone augmentation techniques. However, limited data exist on their biomechanical stability when using different suture-based fixation techniques. This study aimed to evaluate primary stability and micromotion after glenoid augmentation using a scapular spine bone block. A total of 31 fresh-frozen human shoulder specimens underwent bone block augmentation. The specimens were randomized into three groups: double-screw fixation (DSF), single-suture bone block cerclage (SSBBC), and double-suture bone block cerclage (DSBBC). Biomechanical testing was conducted using cyclic loading (5000 cycles at 1 Hz) and micromotion was analyzed using an optical 3D measurement system. Statistical analysis showed that medial irreversible displacement was significantly greater in the SSBBC group compared to DSF ( = 0.0386), and no significant differences were found in anterior or inferior irreversible displacements. A significant difference was noted in posterior reversible displacement ( = 0.0035), while no differences were found in inferior or medial reversible displacements. Between DSF and DSBBC, no significant differences were found in irreversible or reversible displacements in any direction. DSBBC provided stability comparable to DSF while offering a viable metal-free alternative. In contrast, SSBBC displayed inferior biomechanical properties, raising concerns about its clinical reliability.
当伴有严重的肩胛盂骨缺损时,前下肩脱位需要手术干预。肩胛冈骨块已成为传统骨增强技术的一种有前景的替代方法。然而,关于使用不同的基于缝线的固定技术时其生物力学稳定性的数据有限。本研究旨在评估使用肩胛冈骨块进行肩胛盂增强后的初始稳定性和微动情况。共对31个新鲜冷冻的人体肩部标本进行了骨块增强。标本被随机分为三组:双螺钉固定(DSF)、单缝线骨块环扎(SSBBC)和双缝线骨块环扎(DSBBC)。使用循环加载(1Hz下5000次循环)进行生物力学测试,并使用光学三维测量系统分析微动情况。统计分析表明,与DSF组相比,SSBBC组的内侧不可逆位移显著更大( = 0.0386),而在前侧或下侧不可逆位移方面未发现显著差异。后侧可逆位移存在显著差异( = 0.0035),而下侧或内侧可逆位移未发现差异。在DSF和DSBBC之间,在任何方向的不可逆或可逆位移方面均未发现显著差异。DSBBC提供了与DSF相当的稳定性,同时提供了一种可行的无金属替代方案。相比之下,SSBBC表现出较差的生物力学性能,这引发了对其临床可靠性的担忧。