Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA.
Department of Orthopedics, Samaritan Health Services, Corvallis, OR, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec;33(12):2850-2858. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
A failed prior Latarjet procedure can be a challenging situation for both patients and surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report on the techniques and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure.
A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies which reported on surgical techniques for a failed Latarjet procedure with reporting of clinical outcomes. The search terms used were Latarjet failed. Patients were evaluated based on revision method, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), reoperation rates, recurrent instability, overall satisfaction, and return to sports and work.
Thirteen studies (all Level IV evidence) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 293 shoulders with a mean age of 28.3 years (range, 16-55 years) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up time was 50.4 months (range, 14.0-208.0 months) and males accounted for 78.6% of all patients. Revision procedures included open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. These may all be viable techniques for revision surgery for a failed Latarjet procedure. All revision procedures showed improvements in PROMs including the Visual Analogue Scale, Constant score, subjective shoulder value, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores. Return to sports ranged from 46.1% to 94%. Recurrent instability rates ranged from 0% to 43.8%. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 31.3%. Overall satisfaction following a revision procedure ranged from 80% to 100%.
A failed Latarjet procedure can be treated with various revision procedures such as open and arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette, distal tibial allograft, iliac crest autograft, osteochondral glenoid allograft, and Bankart repair and/or capsular plication. Overall, surgical management of the failed Latarjet results in improvements in PROMs, pain, return to sports, and decreased recurrent instability with a moderate complication rate.
对于患者和外科医生来说,先前的 Latarjet 手术失败都是一个具有挑战性的情况。本研究的目的是报告接受复发性前肩不稳定治疗的患者,这些患者先前 Latarjet 手术失败,并报告手术技术和结果。
通过搜索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 来进行系统综述,以确定报告 Latarjet 手术失败的手术技术并报告临床结果的临床研究。使用的搜索词是 Latarjet failed。根据翻修方法、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、再次手术率、复发性不稳定、整体满意度以及重返运动和工作,对患者进行评估。
13 项研究(均为 IV 级证据)符合纳入标准,共包括 293 例肩部,手术时的平均年龄为 28.3 岁(范围,16-55 岁)。平均随访时间为 50.4 个月(范围,14.0-208.0 个月),所有患者中男性占 78.6%。翻修手术包括开放性和关节镜下 Eden-Hybinette、胫骨远端同种异体移植物、髂嵴自体移植物、骨软骨关节盂同种异体移植物和 Bankart 修复术和/或囊瓣紧缩术。这些可能都是 Latarjet 手术失败的可行翻修技术。所有翻修手术的 PROMs 均有改善,包括视觉模拟评分、Constant 评分、主观肩部值、Walch-Duplay 和 Rowe 评分。重返运动的比例为 46.1%至 94%。复发性不稳定率为 0%至 43.8%。再次手术率为 0%至 31.3%。翻修手术后的总体满意度为 80%至 100%。
各种翻修手术,如开放性和关节镜下 Eden-Hybinette、胫骨远端同种异体移植物、髂嵴自体移植物、骨软骨关节盂同种异体移植物和 Bankart 修复术和/或囊瓣紧缩术,可用于治疗 Latarjet 手术失败。总体而言,Latarjet 手术失败的手术治疗可改善 PROMs、疼痛、重返运动和减少复发性不稳定,且并发症发生率中等。