Suppr超能文献

高频使用人工泪液补充剂人群的特征分析

Characterization of Individuals with High-Frequency Artificial Tear Supplement Use.

作者信息

Wu Wan-Lin, Chang Shu-Wen

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21, Section 2, Nanya S. Road, Banqiao District, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.

Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan S. Road, Taipei City 220, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2694. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082694.

Abstract

: We aimed to investigate dry eye parameters as potential predisposing factors and estimate the prevalence of high-frequency topical eye drop usage. : A total of 5594 dry eye patients treated between November 2015 and June 2022 were included. High users ( = 180) were those who applied at least one artificial tear drop per hour, whereas those who used artificial tears fewer than four times daily were classified as low users ( = 5414). Differences in self-reported symptoms (OSDI, SPEED questionnaires) and tear-related parameters, including severity of corneal staining (SPK), fluorescein tear-film break-up time (FTBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), number of expressible meibomian glands (MGE), meiboscale, and blink patterns, were assessed. Subsequent follow-up comprehensive dry eye assessments were performed at 3 months. : There was no difference in age or sex between high users and low users ( = 0.075 and 0.508, respectively). High users had significantly higher symptom scores ( < 0.001), more total blinks ( = 0.001), lower Schirmer scores ( < 0.001), higher SPK grades ( < 0.001), shorter FTBUT ( = 0.010), and higher limbal redness scores ( = 0.002). However, there were no differences in the LLT, MGE, or meiboscale. The compliance with follow-up examinations at 3 months was significantly greater for the high users ( < 0.001). Patients with OSDI scores > 40, SPEED scores > 12, Schirmer scores ≤ 3 mm, and higher compliance with follow-up examinations had odds ratios of 4.0, 3.3, 1.7, and 4.1, respectively, for being high users (95% confidence intervals = 2.8-5.8, 2.4-4.7, 1.2-2.3 and 2.7-5.2, respectively). Among the high users, reducing topical drops significantly decreased the SPEED and OSDI scores, except for the environmental trigger factor in the OSDI questionnaire. During long-term follow-up, 1.1% of low users and 15.4% of high users received cyclosporine treatment (odds ratio 16.4, < 0.001). : OSDI scores > 40, SPEED scores > 12, and Schirmer scores ≤ 3 mm were associated with high-frequency eye drop usage, which accounted for 3.2% of moderate to severe dry eye patients. Susceptibility to environmental triggers could represent hyperalgesia/allodynia in high users. High users have a higher need for cyclosporine treatment.

摘要

我们旨在研究干眼参数作为潜在的诱发因素,并估计高频局部使用眼药水的患病率。纳入了2015年11月至2022年6月期间接受治疗的5594例干眼患者。高使用量者(n = 180)是指每小时至少使用一滴人工泪液的患者,而每天使用人工泪液少于4次的患者被归类为低使用量者(n = 5414)。评估了自我报告症状(OSDI、SPEED问卷)和泪液相关参数的差异,包括角膜染色严重程度(SPK)、荧光素泪膜破裂时间(FTBUT)、脂质层厚度(LLT)、可挤压睑板腺数量(MGE)、睑板腺分级和眨眼模式。随后在3个月时进行了后续的综合干眼评估。高使用量者和低使用量者在年龄或性别上没有差异(分别为P = 0.075和0.508)。高使用量者的症状评分显著更高(P < 0.001),总眨眼次数更多(P = 0.001),Schirmer评分更低(P < 0.001),SPK分级更高(P < 0.001),FTBUT更短(P = 0.010),角膜缘充血评分更高(P = 0.002)。然而,LLT、MGE或睑板腺分级没有差异。高使用量者在3个月时对后续检查的依从性显著更高(P < 0.001)。OSDI评分>40、SPEED评分>12、Schirmer评分≤3 mm且对后续检查依从性更高的患者成为高使用量者的优势比分别为4.0、3.3、1.7和4.1(95%置信区间分别为2.8 - 5.8、2.4 - 4.7、1.2 - 2.3和2.7 - 5.2)。在高使用量者中,减少局部用药显著降低了SPEED和OSDI评分,但OSDI问卷中的环境触发因素除外。在长期随访中,1.1%的低使用量者和15.4%的高使用量者接受了环孢素治疗(优势比16.4,P < 0.001)。OSDI评分>40、SPEED评分>12和Schirmer评分≤3 mm与高频眼药水使用相关,这占中度至重度干眼患者的3.2%。对环境触发因素的易感性可能代表高使用量者的痛觉过敏/异常性疼痛。高使用量者对环孢素治疗的需求更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfb/12027582/3bbbd74ed39e/jcm-14-02694-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验