Kanthasamy Vijayabharathy, Finlay Malcolm, Earley Mark, Hunter Ross J, Lim Phang Boon, Keene Daniel, Whinnett Zachary, Mann Ian, Daheley Manpreet, Cicala Federica, Sporton Simon, Schilling Richard J
Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
OneWelbeck Heart Health, London, UK; Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Aug;22(8):1935-1945. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.010. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
The increasing demand for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, coupled with reduced inpatient hospital beds, presents challenges for health care providers, with limited data on the safety and efficacy of performing AF ablation in an ambulatory day surgery center (ADSC) outside the hospital walls.
This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of catheter ablation for AF in an ADSC in a non-hospital setting.
A retrospective review was conducted over 4 years of all consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation at a newly established ADSC. Eligibility criteria included body mass index <45 and undergoing either first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or redo PVI/atrial tachycardia ablation. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiography-guided transseptal puncture.
A total of 450 patients underwent AF ablation, with a median age of 61 years (54-69), and 95% were undergoing their first AF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation was performed in 350 patients (78%), and 80% had paroxysmal AF. The median procedure duration was 58 (50-70) minutes, with successful PVI achieved in all cases. Two patients required same-day hospital transfer but were managed conservatively. The overall acute procedural adverse events rate was 1.2%, with no cases of tamponade or major complications requiring intervention. Three patients (0.6%) required medical attention within 30 days postprocedure.
Our large single-center experience represents the first report in Europe, demonstrating that AF catheter ablation in an ADSC is both safe and feasible. These results suggest that, with standardized protocols and the development of "one size fits all" technologies, this approach could see broader adoption.
心房颤动(AF)消融需求的不断增加,再加上住院病床数量减少,给医疗服务提供者带来了挑战,而关于在医院外的门诊日间手术中心(ADSC)进行AF消融的安全性和有效性的数据有限。
本研究旨在评估在非医院环境的ADSC中进行AF导管消融的安全性和可行性。
对一家新建ADSC连续4年接受导管消融的所有患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准包括体重指数<45,且接受首次肺静脉隔离(PVI)或再次PVI/房性心动过速消融。手术在全身麻醉下进行,采用经食管超声心动图引导下的经房间隔穿刺。
共有450例患者接受了AF消融,中位年龄为61岁(54 - 69岁),95%的患者为首次进行AF消融。350例患者(78%)采用冷冻球囊消融,80%的患者为阵发性AF。中位手术时间为58(50 - 70)分钟,所有病例均成功完成PVI。2例患者需要当日转院,但经保守治疗。总体急性手术不良事件发生率为1.2%,无心包填塞或需要干预的重大并发症病例。3例患者(0.6%)在术后30天内需要医疗处理。
我们的大型单中心经验是欧洲的首例报告,表明在ADSC中进行AF导管消融既安全又可行。这些结果表明,通过标准化方案和“一刀切”技术的发展,这种方法可能会得到更广泛的应用。