He Ruiwen, Zhang Tonghan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Of Stomatology, Zhongshan City, 528400, Zhongshan, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 26;29(5):276. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06353-x.
To compare the anesthetic effects of combined block anesthesia of inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve and buccal nerve guided by 3D printed indicator (IGT) with Halstead Technique (HT) in the extraction of mandibular third molars.
A total of 210 patients with impacted mandibular third molars who were admitted to the outpatient department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Zhongshan People's Hospital from 2022.10 to 2023.3 were randomly divided into IGT group and HT group, with 105 patients in each group. The onset time, anesthesia effect, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups of patients.
There was no statistical difference between the IGT group and the HT group in terms of anesthesia success rate (P = 0.180), anesthesia onset time (P = 0.213), and anesthesia effect (P = 0.933). In terms of anesthesia safety the incidence of anesthesia risk factors in the IGT group was 1.9%, and the incidence of anesthesia risk factors in the HT group was 8.6%. There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.030) between the two groups.
The Combined block anesthesia of inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve and buccal nerve guided by 3D printed indicator can obtain good anesthetic effect in the extraction of mandibular third molars. Compared with the Halstead Technique, it is safer.
TRIAL REGISTRATION (RETROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED): The trail was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400087941,07/08/2024).
Impacted mandibular third molar is a common clinical disease. When extracting the mandibular third molar, it is usually necessary to perform inferior alveolar nerve block. However, the current mainstream inferior alveolar nerve block has certain limitations. This study aims to introduce a method of inferior alveolar nerve block guided by a 3D printed indicator and compare it with traditional anesthesia technique, providing a new approach for dentists in this field.
比较3D打印导板(IGT)引导下的下牙槽神经、舌神经和颊神经联合阻滞麻醉与哈尔斯特德技术(HT)在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中的麻醉效果。
选取2022年10月至2023年3月在中山市人民医院口腔颌面外科门诊就诊的210例下颌阻生第三磨牙患者,随机分为IGT组和HT组,每组105例。比较两组患者的起效时间、麻醉效果及并发症发生率。
IGT组与HT组在麻醉成功率(P = 0.180)、麻醉起效时间(P = 0.213)和麻醉效果(P = 0.933)方面差异无统计学意义。在麻醉安全性方面,IGT组麻醉风险因素发生率为1.9%,HT组麻醉风险因素发生率为8.6%。两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.030)。
3D打印导板引导下的下牙槽神经、舌神经和颊神经联合阻滞麻醉在下颌第三磨牙拔除术中能获得良好的麻醉效果。与哈尔斯特德技术相比,更安全。
试验注册(回顾性注册):该试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2400087941,2024年8月7日)。
下颌阻生第三磨牙是临床常见疾病。拔除下颌第三磨牙时通常需要进行下牙槽神经阻滞。然而,目前主流的下牙槽神经阻滞存在一定局限性。本研究旨在介绍一种3D打印导板引导下的下牙槽神经阻滞方法,并与传统麻醉技术进行比较,为该领域的牙医提供一种新方法。