Burkhard-Meier Anton, Rechenauer Vera Valerie, Jurinovic Vindi, Albertsmeier Markus, Hoberger Michael, Dürr Hans Roland, Klein Alexander, Knösel Thomas, Kunz Wolfgang G, Mock Andreas, Pusztai Ada, Völkl Michael, von Bergwelt-Baildon Michael, Lindner Lars H, Di Gioia Dorit, Berclaz Luc M
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 26;151(4):150. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8.
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.
Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.
At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.
This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.
上皮样血管内皮瘤(EHE)是一种极为罕见的、具有易位特征的血管肉瘤,疾病进程具有异质性。晚期EHE患者的最佳全身治疗方案仍不明确。我们旨在评估帕唑帕尼(PAZ)作为转移性EHE一线治疗的价值。
回顾性分析了2012年至2023年间在我院接受PAZ一线治疗的13例转移性EHE患者的临床结局。
中位随访51.4个月时,中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为35.1个月和53.8个月。在有先前肿瘤进展记录的患者(n = 10)中,中位PFS和OS分别为12.6个月和105个月。在有浆膜腔积液/全身症状的患者(n = 4)中,中位PFS和OS分别为6.1个月和10.3个月。整个队列的临床获益率为62%,无完全或部分缓解。4例患者中有2例在PAZ治疗下症状减轻(分别为疼痛减轻、腹水减少/咯血)。毒性主要为胃肠道反应,可通过降低剂量控制。1例患者因毒性需要永久中断治疗。
这是第一项系统报告PAZ作为转移性EHE患者一线治疗生存结局的研究。PAZ对转移性EHE患者有效且安全,对于特定患者亚组可考虑作为西罗莫司的替代药物。在评估EHE的治疗反应时,应质疑RECIST标准。