Pedersen Torben Brøchner, Secher Caroline, Moumneh Ali, Hvid Nanna, Lund Martin, Fojecki Grzegorz, Lund Lars
Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Urol. 2025 Aug;214(2):156-166. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004576. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
We evaluate the efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-SWT) compared with a sham treatment in improving erectile function in men after radical prostatectomy. Erectile function was assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.
A total of 75 participants were randomized to either LI-SWT or sham treatment. Data were analyzed using a zero-inflated negative binomial model for IIEF scores and appropriate nonparametric methods for the ordinal EHS data, including binary transformation for clinically relevant outcomes.
The zero-inflated model for IIEF scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups with a ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.1-2.4, = .469). At 24 weeks posttreatment, the estimated median IIEF score was 4 in the LI-SWT group compared with 4 in the sham group. For EHS, no significant treatment effect was found, with median scores at 24 weeks of 2 in the LI-SWT group vs 2 in the sham group. The proportion of patients achieving sufficient erection hardness (EHS ≥3) at 24 weeks was 18% (95% CI: 9%-34%) in the LI-SWT group vs 26% (95% CI: 14%-43%) in the sham group ( = .552).
This study did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in erectile function for men undergoing LI-SWT compared with sham treatment after radical prostatectomy.
我们评估低能量体外冲击波疗法(LI-SWT)与假治疗相比,对前列腺癌根治术后男性勃起功能改善的疗效。在基线以及治疗后4周、12周和24周,使用勃起硬度评分(EHS)和国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评估勃起功能。
总共75名参与者被随机分为LI-SWT组或假治疗组。使用零膨胀负二项式模型分析IIEF评分数据,并使用适当的非参数方法分析有序EHS数据,包括对临床相关结果进行二元转换。
IIEF评分的零膨胀模型显示,治疗组之间无显著差异,比值为1.2(95%CI:0.1-2.4,P = 0.469)。治疗后24周,LI-SWT组的估计IIEF中位数评分为4,假治疗组为4。对于EHS,未发现显著的治疗效果,LI-SWT组和假治疗组在24周时的中位数评分均为2。LI-SWT组在24周时达到足够勃起硬度(EHS≥3)的患者比例为18%(95%CI:9%-34%),假治疗组为26%(95%CI:14%-43%)(P = 0.552)。
本研究未证明与前列腺癌根治术后接受假治疗的男性相比,接受LI-SWT治疗的男性勃起功能有统计学上的显著改善。