Stenson Bryan A, Shaw Daniel L, MacDougall Gordon, Kolikof Joshua, Gaudet Cynthia, Grossestreuer Anne, Sanchez Leon D, Chiu David T
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;94:140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.034. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
In September 2024, there was an abrupt intravenous (IV) fluid shortage in the United States due to the unexpected closure of a major production facility. In response, hospitals rationed scarce IV fluids. While this was aimed at reducing utilization, the impact on patient care is unclear. This study assesses the impact of reduced IV fluid ordering on emergency department (ED) operational metrics.
Retrospective cohort study at an urban academic medical center ED with 55,000 annual encounters. All patients seen during the pre-shortage (7/1/24-9/30/24) and post-shortage (10/1/24-11/13/24) periods were included. We assessed differences between proportions of patients receiving IV fluid, volume of fluids, length of stay (LOS), and 72-h return rate. We also assessed a subgroup of discharged patients with gastrointestinal illness. Comparisons used a Wilcoxon ranked-sum, Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Logistic regression was performed with controls for age, gender, and emergency severity index (ESI).
IV fluids were given in a smaller proportion of patients (20 % vs 24 %, p < 0.001) and at lower volumes post-shortage. Discharged patients with gastrointestinal symptoms likewise had lower IV fluid use (30 % vs 42 %, p < 0.001), decreased LOS (7.1 vs 7.8 h, p < 0.001) and no change in 72-h return rate (p = 0.156).
During the 2024 IV fluid shortage, fewer patients received fluids at lower volumes per patient. This held true for discharged patients with GI symptoms. Overall, LOS decreased without an increase in 72-h return rate. Improved throughput without changes in return rate represents a potential process improvement and warrants further evaluation.
2024年9月,由于一家主要生产设施意外关闭,美国突然出现静脉输液短缺。作为应对措施,医院对稀缺的静脉输液进行了配给。虽然这旨在减少使用量,但对患者护理的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了减少静脉输液医嘱对急诊科(ED)运营指标的影响。
在一家每年接诊55000例患者的城市学术医疗中心急诊科进行回顾性队列研究。纳入短缺前(2024年7月1日至9月30日)和短缺后(2024年10月1日至11月13日)期间就诊的所有患者。我们评估了接受静脉输液的患者比例、输液量、住院时间(LOS)和72小时复诊率之间的差异。我们还评估了一组出院的胃肠道疾病患者。根据情况,比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。进行逻辑回归时对年龄、性别和急诊严重程度指数(ESI)进行了控制。
短缺后接受静脉输液的患者比例较小(20%对24%,p<0.001),输液量也较低。有胃肠道症状的出院患者同样静脉输液使用量较低(30%对42%,p<0.001),住院时间缩短(7.1小时对7.8小时,p<0.001),72小时复诊率无变化(p=0.156)。
在2024年静脉输液短缺期间,接受输液的患者减少,每位患者的输液量降低。有胃肠道症状的出院患者情况也是如此。总体而言,住院时间缩短,72小时复诊率未增加。在复诊率不变的情况下提高了 throughput(此处原文可能有误,推测为“效率”之类的意思),这代表了一种潜在的流程改进,值得进一步评估。