Çötert I, Ulusoy M, Türk A G
Private Practice, İzmir, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics Bornova, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2025 Apr 1;28(4):461-470. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_772_23. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
Hybrid-abutment crowns and screwmentable crowns offer a fusion of the benefits from both screw and cement-retained restorations, potentially enhancing the overall performance of the restoration.
This study aimed to evaluate the screw loosening and fracture strength of hybrid-abutment crowns and screwmentable crowns made with two different materials.
Forty single-crown were made on titanium implants and divided into four groups (n = 10) [SM-Ti: Screwmentable titanium-porcelain crowns on stock titanium abutment; SM-Zr: Screwmentable zirconia-porcelain crowns on stock zirconia abutment; AC-Ti: Titanium-porcelain abutment crowns; AC-Zr: Zirconia-porcelain abutment crowns.] Specimens were torqued with 30 NCm and thermocycled between 5℃ and 55℃ in 20-second cycles for 5000 cycles. Removal torque values (RTV) were measured. Following the RTV measurement, the screws were changed with fresh screws and torqued again. Afterwards, specimens were loaded to fracture and fracture strengths were recorded, failure modes were examined.
Analysis of variance and Bonferroni test was performed.
The AC-Ti group displayed the highest mean torque loss (%20.09 ± 6.49) and the SM-Ti group displayed the lowest (%9.59 ± 8.84). Only the difference between AC-Ti and SM-Ti groups was found statistically significant, there are no significant differences between other groups. The fracture strengths are 385.84 ± 27.68 N, 313.18 ± 39.97 N, 272.69 ± 35.03 N, and 156.71 ± 19.83 N for AC-Ti, AC-Zr, SM-Ti, and SM-Zr groups, respectively and all differences were found to be statistically significant. Failures occurred as deformation in titanium components, whereas fractures were observed in zirconia components.
Screw loosening was observed only in the AC-Ti group. No significant difference was observed among the torque loss values in the remaining groups. Titanium and zirconia materials do not exert any influence on screw loosening after thermal aging for hybrid-abutment crowns. Moreover, when assessing fracture strength, hybrid-abutment crowns exhibit superior strength and durability compared to screwmentable crowns.
混合基台冠和可旋紧冠融合了螺丝固位和粘结固位修复体的优点,有可能提高修复体的整体性能。
本研究旨在评估用两种不同材料制作的混合基台冠和可旋紧冠的螺丝松动情况及断裂强度。
在钛种植体上制作40个单冠,并分为四组(n = 10)[SM-Ti:在库存钛基台上的可旋紧钛瓷冠;SM-Zr:在库存氧化锆基台上的可旋紧氧化锆瓷冠;AC-Ti:钛瓷基台冠;AC-Zr:氧化锆瓷基台冠。]标本用30牛厘米的扭矩拧紧,并在5℃至55℃之间以20秒的周期进行热循环5000次。测量拆除扭矩值(RTV)。在RTV测量之后,用新螺丝更换螺丝并再次拧紧。之后,对标本加载直至断裂并记录断裂强度,检查失败模式。
进行方差分析和Bonferroni检验。
AC-Ti组显示出最高的平均扭矩损失(20.09%±6.49),而SM-Ti组显示出最低的(9.59%±8.84)。仅发现AC-Ti组和SM-Ti组之间的差异具有统计学意义,其他组之间没有显著差异。AC-Ti、AC-Zr、SM-Ti和SM-Zr组的断裂强度分别为385.84±27.68牛、313.18±39.97牛、272.69±35.03牛和156.71±19.83牛,且所有差异均具有统计学意义。失败表现为钛部件变形,而在氧化锆部件中观察到断裂。
仅在AC-Ti组中观察到螺丝松动。其余组的扭矩损失值之间未观察到显著差异。对于混合基台冠,钛和氧化锆材料在热老化后对螺丝松动没有任何影响。此外,在评估断裂强度时,混合基台冠比可旋紧冠表现出更高的强度和耐久性。