Geertsema Jorine, Juncker Hannah G, Wilmes Lars, Burchell George L, de Rooij Susanne R, van Goudoever J B, O'Riordan Kenneth J, Clarke Gerard, Cryan John F, Korosi Aniko
Brain Plasticity group, Centre for Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03020-1.
Exposure to stress during sensitive developmental periods comes with long term consequences for neurobehavioral outcomes and increases vulnerability to psychopathology later in life. While we have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the programming effects of early-life stress (ES), these are not yet fully understood and often hard to target, making the development of effective interventions challenging. In recent years, we and others have suggested that nutrition might be instrumental in modulating and possibly combatting the ES-induced increased risk to psychopathologies and neurobehavioral impairments. Nutritional strategies are very promising as they might be relatively safe, cheap and easy to implement. Here, we set out to comprehensively review the existing literature on nutritional interventions aimed at counteracting the effects of ES on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical and clinical settings. We identified eighty six rodent and ten human studies investigating a nutritional intervention to ameliorate ES-induced impairments. The human evidence to date, is too few and heterogeneous in terms of interventions, thus not allowing hard conclusions, however the preclinical studies, despite their heterogeneity in terms of designs, interventions used, and outcomes measured, showed nutritional interventions to be promising in combatting ES-induced impairments. Furthermore, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of nutrition on the brain after ES, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation and the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Lastly, we highlight the critical gaps in our current knowledge and make recommendations for future research to move the field forward.
在敏感的发育阶段暴露于压力之下会对神经行为结果产生长期影响,并增加日后患精神病理学疾病的易感性。虽然我们对早期生活压力(ES)编程效应的潜在机制的理解有所进展,但这些机制尚未完全明了,且往往难以针对,这使得开发有效的干预措施具有挑战性。近年来,我们和其他人都提出,营养可能有助于调节并可能对抗ES导致的患精神病理学疾病和神经行为损伤风险增加的情况。营养策略很有前景,因为它们可能相对安全、廉价且易于实施。在此,我们着手全面综述现有的关于营养干预的文献,这些干预旨在抵消ES对临床前和临床环境中神经行为结果的影响。我们确定了86项啮齿动物研究和10项人类研究,这些研究调查了旨在改善ES诱导损伤的营养干预措施。迄今为止的人类证据在干预措施方面太少且存在异质性,因此无法得出确凿结论,然而临床前研究尽管在设计、所用干预措施和测量结果方面存在异质性,但显示营养干预在对抗ES诱导的损伤方面很有前景。此外,我们讨论了ES后营养对大脑有益作用可能涉及的机制,包括神经炎症、氧化应激、下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴调节以及微生物群 - 肠 - 脑轴。最后,我们强调了当前知识中的关键差距,并为推动该领域发展的未来研究提出了建议。