Devleeschouwer Charlie, Galand Benoît, Tolmatcheff Chloé, Salmivalli Christina
Psychological Sciences Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Department of Development Psychology, Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aggress Behav. 2025 May;51(3):e70026. doi: 10.1002/ab.70026.
For decades, empathy has been hypothesized as a protective factor against bullying. However, this hypothesis is mainly supported by cross-sectional studies, while longitudinal research on bullying and empathy is still scarce. The present study aimed to fill this gap by conducting random-intercept cross-lagged panel models of the relations between cognitive and affective empathy and bullying behaviors across three-time points each separated by 5 months, separately for boys and girls. Results from 1228 elementary school students (52.92% boys; Mage = 10.19, SD = 1.13) indicated that the associations between bullying and empathy are different for boys and girls. For boys, cognitive and affective empathy are negatively associated with bullying at the between level. At the within level, the only significant cross-lagged path indicated that a positive deviation from the expected score of cognitive empathy at baseline predicted a positive deviation from the expected score in bullying behavior 5 months later. For girls, there were no associations between empathy and bullying at either the within- or between-level. This study calls for further clarification of the direction of the relation between bullying and empathy before incorporating it into prevention programs.
几十年来,共情一直被假定为预防欺凌的一个保护因素。然而,这一假设主要得到横断面研究的支持,而关于欺凌与共情的纵向研究仍然匮乏。本研究旨在通过对认知共情和情感共情与欺凌行为之间的关系进行随机截距交叉滞后面板模型分析来填补这一空白,该分析在三个时间点进行,每个时间点间隔5个月,分别针对男孩和女孩。对1228名小学生(52.92%为男孩;平均年龄=10.19,标准差=1.13)的研究结果表明,欺凌与共情之间的关联在男孩和女孩中有所不同。对于男孩,认知共情和情感共情在组间水平上与欺凌呈负相关。在个体水平上,唯一显著的交叉滞后路径表明,基线时认知共情预期得分的正向偏差预测了5个月后欺凌行为预期得分的正向偏差。对于女孩,共情与欺凌在个体水平或组间水平上均无关联。本研究呼吁在将欺凌与共情之间的关系纳入预防项目之前,进一步明确其关系方向。