Suppr超能文献

一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后非小细胞肺癌患者中抗血管生成剂联合免疫化疗的生存比较分析:一项回顾性队列研究

Comparative Survival Analysis of Anti-Angiogenic Agent Plus Immunochemotherapy in NSCLC Patients After Frontline EGFR-TKI Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Su Yi-Tse, Tey Shu-Farn, Lee Chung-Ta, Lin Chien-Yu, Tsai Jeng-Shiuan, Lin Chien-Chung, Kuo Chin-Wei

机构信息

Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):e70023. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.70023. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

Abstract

Advanced-stage EGFR-mutated lung non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) challenges current treatment paradigms, particularly after frontline EGFR-TKI therapy failure. This study investigates the survival impact of combined anti-angiogenic agent and immunochemotherapy (AICT) for this population. We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC patients at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2022, focusing on those who had disease progression beyond frontline EGFR-TKI treatments. Survival outcomes were assessed through progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival post-TKI failure (OSpTKI). Propensity score was employed to match patients, with Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox regression analysis determining the survival benefits. Analyses were also performed for subgroups based on PD-L1 level, treatment lines, and regimens. A total of 412 patients were enrolled, with 27 receiving AICT. Compared to patients who did not receive AICT, those who received AICT had longer PFS (5.9 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.024) and longer OSpTKI (17.9 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.018). The observed survival advantage in PFS and OSpTKI was consistent in both the original cohort (for PFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-0.90, p = 0.014; for OSpTKI: HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.24-0.69, p < 0.001) and after propensity score matching (for PFS: HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.98, p = 0.014; for OSpTKI: HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.26-0.79, p = 0.006). In the subgroup analyses, patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, those who received AICT as a second-line therapy, or those treated in conjunction with pemetrexed showed a PFS benefit. AICT improves survival outcomes in advanced-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC, advocating for its integration into treatment regimens.

摘要

晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)对当前的治疗模式构成挑战,尤其是在一线EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗失败之后。本研究调查了联合抗血管生成药物和免疫化疗(AICT)对该人群生存情况的影响。我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2022年12月在国立成功大学医院就诊的NSCLC患者,重点关注那些在一线EGFR-TKI治疗后出现疾病进展的患者。通过无进展生存期(PFS)和TKI治疗失败后的总生存期(OSpTKI)评估生存结果。采用倾向评分法对患者进行匹配,通过Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox回归分析确定生存获益情况。还根据程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)水平、治疗线数和治疗方案对亚组进行了分析。共纳入412例患者,其中27例接受了AICT治疗。与未接受AICT治疗的患者相比,接受AICT治疗的患者PFS更长(5.9个月对3.9个月,p = 0.024),OSpTKI也更长(17.9个月对11.9个月,p = 0.018)。在原始队列(PFS:风险比[HR]=0.59,95%置信区间[CI]=0.39-0.90,p = 0.014;OSpTKI:HR = 0.41,95%CI = 0.24-0.69,p < 0.001)和倾向评分匹配后(PFS:HR = 0.56,95%CI = 0.35-0.98,p = 0.014;OSpTKI:HR = 0.45,95%CI = 0.26-0.79,p = 0.006),观察到的PFS和OSpTKI生存优势均一致。在亚组分析中,PD-L1≥1%的患者、接受AICT作为二线治疗的患者或联合培美曲塞治疗的患者显示出PFS获益。AICT可改善晚期EGFR突变NSCLC的生存结果,主张将其纳入治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验