Dong Bolin, Liu Huan
School of Marxism, Tongling University, Tongling, China.
School of Social Science, Soochow University, Su Zhou, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;13:1419294. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1419294. eCollection 2025.
With aging and family nuclearization, providing care for older adults and children has become a global issue. This study empirically examines the impact of care service supply on household consumption inequality.
Data from the China Family Panel Studies are analyzed using the ordinary least squares estimation method.
First, childcare and older adult care significantly impact household consumption inequality by 0.23 and 0.35%, respectively. Further, their impacts on household consumption inequalities at different inequality levels show gradually increasing trend. Moreover, significant group heterogeneity is observed in the impact coefficients. Second, under the dual care pressures for childcare and older adult care, the supply of dual-care services significantly affects household consumption inequality by 0.05%.
Care service supply has an income effect; that is, the supply of family care services affects household consumption inequality by influencing household income inequality. Policy considerations include improving the precision of social welfare and assistance policies, and enhancing the supply mechanism of care services.
随着老龄化和家庭核心化,照顾老年人和儿童已成为一个全球性问题。本研究实证检验了护理服务供给对家庭消费不平等的影响。
使用普通最小二乘法估计方法对中国家庭追踪调查的数据进行分析。
首先,儿童照料和老年人照料对家庭消费不平等有显著影响,分别为0.23%和0.35%。此外,它们对不同不平等水平的家庭消费不平等的影响呈逐渐增加趋势。而且,在影响系数中观察到显著的群体异质性。其次,在儿童照料和老年人照料的双重照料压力下,双重照料服务的供给对家庭消费不平等有显著影响,为0.05%。
护理服务供给具有收入效应;也就是说,家庭护理服务的供给通过影响家庭收入不平等来影响家庭消费不平等。政策考量包括提高社会福利和援助政策的精准度,以及加强护理服务供给机制。