Perkoski Valerie, Shotwell Mary, Chatto Charlotte, Chandler Judy
Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, 1800 South Novell Place, Provo, UT 84606, USA.
University of the Cumberlands, 6178 College Station Dr, Williamsburg, KY 40769, USA.
Health Care Transit. 2025 Apr 18;3:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2025.100102. eCollection 2025.
Adults with severe and profound intellectual disabilities (SPIDs) often encounter more significant healthcare needs than those without disabilities. People with SPIDs are more likely to have mobility impairments (MIs), yet little is known about physical activity (PA) experiences among those with SPIDs and MIs once they transition out of pediatric and school-based settings. This study explores the experience of PA in adults with SPIDs and MIs based on clinician perspectives.
Eight clinicians engaged in a semi-structured interview and described their experiences with PA in adults with SPIDs/MIs. Interviews were analyzed to determine common themes, and a reflexivity journal and field notes were used to corroborate and supplement findings. Data was organized according to the 5 socio-ecological model (SEM) levels and 16 a priori themes (1) intrapersonal: attitudes, physical factors, knowledge, and values, (2) interpersonal: supports outside the home, supports within the home, and home environment considerations, (3) organizational: disability-inclusive organizations, academic institutions, and medical institutions, (4) community: environment and priorities, and (5) policy: home and community-based services (HCBS), financial, academic and programming, and accessibility policies. Clinician-identified barriers and facilitators to PA were grouped under these 16 themes.
The 5 most prevalent PA facilitators included (1) PA preferences as uniquely individualized, (2) organizations providing PA for adults with multiple disabilities, (3) building, outdoor, and transportation accessibility, (4) the importance of allyship and socialization among those with SPIDs/MIs and between caregivers, and (5) advocacy for promoting monies toward prevention instead of illness. The 5 most prevalent barriers to PA were (1) building, outdoor, and transportation inaccessibility, (2) necessity of education on needs and opportunities for PA, (3) diagnosis, bodily structure, weakness, or pain in adults with SPIDs/MIs, (4) lack of competitive billing structure to support PA programs or clinician reimbursement, and (5) lack of HCBS education and support.
Recognizing the interplay of each SEM level and factors influencing PA engagement may improve access and health outcomes among adults with SPIDs/MIs. Clinicians play a significant role in assessing, educating, and promoting PA opportunities for people with disabilities as they transition into and age within adult and community settings.
与无残疾的成年人相比,患有严重和极重度智力残疾(SPID)的成年人往往有更重大的医疗保健需求。患有SPID的人更有可能存在行动障碍(MI),然而,对于患有SPID和MI的人在从儿科和学校环境过渡出来后的身体活动(PA)经历,我们知之甚少。本研究基于临床医生的视角,探讨患有SPID和MI的成年人的PA经历。
八位临床医生参与了半结构化访谈,描述了他们在患有SPID/MI的成年人中开展PA的经历。对访谈进行分析以确定共同主题,并使用反思日记和实地记录来证实和补充研究结果。数据根据社会生态模型(SEM)的5个层面和16个先验主题进行整理:(1)个人层面:态度、身体因素、知识和价值观;(2)人际层面:家庭外的支持、家庭内的支持以及家庭环境考量;(3)组织层面:包容残疾的组织、学术机构和医疗机构;(4)社区层面:环境和优先事项;(5)政策层面:基于家庭和社区的服务(HCBS)、财务、学术和项目以及无障碍政策。临床医生确定的PA障碍和促进因素归在这16个主题之下。
5个最普遍的PA促进因素包括:(1)PA偏好具有独特的个体性;(2)为多重残疾成年人提供PA的组织;(3)建筑物、户外和交通的无障碍性;(4)患有SPID/MI的人之间以及照顾者之间盟友关系和社交的重要性;(5)倡导将资金用于预防而非疾病治疗。5个最普遍的PA障碍是:(1)建筑物、户外和交通的无障碍性不足;(2)需要开展关于PA需求和机会的教育;(3)患有SPID/MI的成年人的诊断、身体结构、虚弱或疼痛;(4)缺乏支持PA项目或临床医生报销的竞争性计费结构;(5)缺乏HCBS教育和支持。
认识到每个SEM层面以及影响PA参与的因素之间的相互作用,可能会改善患有SPID/MI的成年人获得PA的机会和健康结果。临床医生在评估、教育和促进残疾人在进入成人和社区环境并在其中成长过程中的PA机会方面发挥着重要作用。