• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳管理模式:印度南部一家三级护理中心的创伤性颈部损伤

A Paradigm for Optimal Management: Traumatic Neck Injuries at a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.

作者信息

Chirukandath Ravindran, Sulaiman Sumin V, Sasi Tinu, Suresh Nanditha, R Agni Vyas, Syamsundar Gopika, Kiran Mathew Antony

机构信息

General Surgery, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Thrissur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81311. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.81311
PMID:40291240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033068/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic neck injuries represent a critical emergency in surgical practice due to the high concentration of vital structures within the cervical region. These injuries can be classified into blunt and penetrating types, each presenting unique challenges in diagnosis and management. While advances in trauma care have improved patient outcomes, the mortality and morbidity associated with neck injuries remain significant, especially in resource-limited settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Government Medical College, Thrissur, analyzing the patterns, management, and outcomes of traumatic neck injuries from January 2022 to December 2024. The study included patients aged 13-79 years, with data collected from medical records, trauma registers, and operative reports. Patient demographics, injury type, anatomical location, management strategies, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 72 traumatic neck injuries were reviewed, with the majority being young males (n=57, 79%). Blunt trauma (n=45, 62%) was more common than penetrating trauma (n=27, 38%), with road traffic accidents (n=32, 44%) and falls (n=20, 28%) being the leading causes of blunt injuries, while stabbing injuries accounted for most penetrating trauma (n=20, 73%). Emergency neck exploration was required in 17 cases (24%), and the overall mortality rate was seven cases (10%), primarily due to exsanguination (n=5, 67%) and vascular damage (n=2, 33%). The highest mortality was observed in penetrating Zone II injuries (n=5 deaths, 13%), often involving major vascular damage. Complications occurred in 13 survivors (18%), including wound infections (n=6, 8%), pneumonia (n=4, 5%), and neurological deficits (n=4, 5%). Night-time injuries were reported in 43 cases (60%), with a peak incidence during festive seasons and weekends, showing a significant association with alcohol consumption.

DISCUSSION

The findings align with global trends, where penetrating injuries, especially in Zone II, carry a significantly higher risk of mortality. The study underscores the importance of early airway management, rapid surgical intervention, and the role of imaging-based triage for blunt trauma cases. The association of neck trauma with alcohol consumption, especially during nighttime hours, highlights the need for targeted public health measures and enhanced trauma response.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, management strategies, and outcomes of traumatic neck injuries in a South Indian tertiary care center. The findings emphasize the critical role of early intervention, particularly in penetrating injuries involving vascular structures, and suggest that public health interventions and improved trauma care systems could optimize outcomes in this high-risk population.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/12033068/b228c17055c6/cureus-0017-00000081311-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/12033068/d055b7a1c367/cureus-0017-00000081311-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/12033068/b228c17055c6/cureus-0017-00000081311-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/12033068/d055b7a1c367/cureus-0017-00000081311-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4003/12033068/b228c17055c6/cureus-0017-00000081311-i02.jpg
摘要

引言

由于颈部区域重要结构高度集中,创伤性颈部损伤是外科手术实践中的一种危急急症。这些损伤可分为钝器伤和穿透伤,每种损伤在诊断和处理上都有独特的挑战。尽管创伤护理的进展改善了患者的预后,但与颈部损伤相关的死亡率和发病率仍然很高,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。

材料与方法

在特里苏尔政府医学院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,分析2022年1月至2024年12月创伤性颈部损伤的模式、处理方法和结果。该研究纳入了年龄在13 - 79岁之间的患者,数据从病历、创伤登记册和手术报告中收集。评估了患者的人口统计学特征、损伤类型、解剖位置、处理策略和临床结果。

结果

共回顾了72例创伤性颈部损伤病例,其中大多数是年轻男性(n = 57,79%)。钝器伤(n = 45,62%)比穿透伤(n = 27,38%)更常见,道路交通事故(n = 32,44%)和跌倒(n = 20,28%)是钝器伤的主要原因,而刺伤是大多数穿透伤的原因(n = 20,73%)。17例(24%)患者需要进行急诊颈部探查,总体死亡率为7例(10%),主要原因是失血(n = 5,67%)和血管损伤(n = 2,33%)。在穿透性Ⅱ区损伤中观察到最高死亡率(n = 5例死亡,13%),通常涉及主要血管损伤。13名幸存者出现并发症(18%),包括伤口感染(n = 6,8%)、肺炎(n = 4,5%)和神经功能缺损(n = 小4,5%)。43例(60%)患者报告为夜间受伤,在节日和周末发病率最高,显示与饮酒有显著关联。

讨论

研究结果与全球趋势一致,即穿透伤,尤其是Ⅱ区的穿透伤,死亡率风险显著更高。该研究强调了早期气道管理、快速手术干预以及基于影像学的钝器伤分诊的作用的重要性。颈部创伤与饮酒的关联,尤其是在夜间,凸显了有针对性的公共卫生措施和加强创伤应对的必要性。

结论

本研究为印度南部三级医疗中心创伤性颈部损伤的流行病学、处理策略和结果提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调了早期干预的关键作用,特别是在涉及血管结构的穿透伤中,并表明公共卫生干预和改善创伤护理系统可以优化这一高危人群的治疗结果。

相似文献

1
A Paradigm for Optimal Management: Traumatic Neck Injuries at a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.最佳管理模式:印度南部一家三级护理中心的创伤性颈部损伤
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81311. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Traumatic renal injury: Five-year experience at a major trauma centre in South Africa.创伤性肾损伤:南非一家大型创伤中心的 5 年经验。
Injury. 2020 Jan;51(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.034. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
3
Penetrating neck trauma: review of 192 cases.穿透性颈部创伤:192例病例回顾
Arch Trauma Res. 2012 Spring;1(1):14-8. doi: 10.5812/atr.5308. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
4
Penetrating neck injuries: analysis of experience from a Canadian trauma centre.穿透性颈部损伤:来自加拿大一家创伤中心的经验分析
Can J Surg. 2001 Apr;44(2):122-6.
5
Not all intestinal traumatic injuries are the same: a comparison of surgically treated blunt vs. penetrating injuries.并非所有肠道创伤性损伤都相同:手术治疗钝性伤与穿透伤的比较。
Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
6
Contemporary Review of Traumatic Axillary and Subclavian Artery Injuries at an Urban Level One Trauma Center.当代城市一级创伤中心创伤性腋动脉和锁骨下动脉损伤的回顾性研究。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Aug;58(6):581-587. doi: 10.1177/15385744241230151. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Civilian vascular trauma, treatment and outcome at a level 1-trauma centre.平民血管创伤,1 级创伤中心的治疗和结果。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 21;30(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01059-5.
8
Epidemiology of Traumatic Injuries in the Northeast Region of Haiti: A Cross-sectional Study.海地东北地区创伤性损伤的流行病学:一项横断面研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Dec;30(6):599-605. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005361. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Penetrating and blunt trauma to the neck: clinical presentation, assessment and emergency management.颈部穿透伤和钝器伤:临床表现、评估及紧急处理
B-ENT. 2016;Suppl 26(2):69-85.
10
Management of Laryngotracheal Trauma: A Five-Year Single Institution Experience.喉气管创伤的管理:一项为期五年的单机构经验。
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;30(100):283-290.

本文引用的文献

1
Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: Descriptive Analysis of a Case Series From an Indian Metropolitan City.穿透性腹部创伤:来自印度一座大都市的病例系列描述性分析
Cureus. 2022 Dec 12;14(12):e32429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32429. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Epidemiological pattern of trauma patients based on the mechanisms of trauma: trends of a regional trauma center in Midwest of Iran.基于创伤机制的创伤患者流行病学模式:伊朗中西部地区一个区域创伤中心的趋势。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00756-9.
3
5-Year management and outcomes of penetrating neck injury in a trauma center. Penetrating neck injury.
5 年创伤中心穿透性颈部损伤的管理和结果。穿透性颈部损伤。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct;100(10):629-634. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.08.017.
4
Endovascular treatment of penetrating vascular injuries.穿透性血管损伤的血管内治疗
J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Nov 11;2021(11):rjab486. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab486. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Computed tomography angiography in the "no-zone" approach era for penetrating neck trauma: A systematic review.计算机断层血管造影在穿透性颈部创伤的“无区”方法时代:系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1233-1238. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002919.
6
Damage control resuscitation.损伤控制复苏
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;7(1):5-13. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.089. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Differences in Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Penetrating Injuries in the USA and the Netherlands: A Multi-institutional Comparison.美国和荷兰穿透伤患者的特征及结局差异:一项多机构比较研究
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3608-3615. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4669-8.
8
Penetrating neck injuries: a guide to evaluation and management.颈部穿透伤:评估与处理指南
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):6-11. doi: 10.1308/rcsbull.2018.6. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Pediatric penetrating neck trauma: Hard signs of injury and selective neck exploration.小儿颈部穿透伤:损伤的硬性体征与选择性颈部探查
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6):989-994. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001407.
10
Selective management of penetrating neck injuries using "no zone" approach.采用“无区域”方法对穿透性颈部损伤进行选择性处理。
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1720-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jun 16.