Suppr超能文献

实际匹配率?尽管实行单一认证,但美国 osteopathic 医学院学生进入骨科手术专业的匹配率显著低于美国医学院学生。 (注:US DO 指美国 osteopathic 医学院,MD 指美国医学院)

The Real Match Rate? US DO Students Match Into Orthopaedic Surgery at Significantly Lower Rates than US MD Students Despite Single Accreditation.

作者信息

Katsma Mark S, Murray Jett B, Balazs George C, Speicher Mark R, Olsen Aaron A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California.

Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Meridian, Idaho.

出版信息

JB JS Open Access. 2025 Apr 25;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00002. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgery remains one of the most competitive residency matches for both senior allopathic (MD) and senior osteopathic (DO) medical students. Despite the completion of a transition to single accreditation of residency programs accredited by the American Osteopathic Association and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in 2020, little is known about the subsequent impact of this new environment for DO and MD orthopaedic applicants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between MD and DO match rates using both Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) data.

METHODS

ERAS applicant data from 2020 to 2023 specific to orthopaedic surgery were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges. NRMP data were queried for the same years. Both NRMP (unadjusted) and ERAS (adjusted) match rates were calculated and compared for each year and cumulatively. In addition, the proportion of ERAS applicants that failed to rank orthopaedic surgery in the NRMP was calculated and compared between senior MD and senior DO applicant groups.

RESULTS

From 2020 to 2023, the unadjusted match rate dropped for MDs (79% vs 73%, p = 0.002) and DOs (63% vs 50%, p = 0.009). Adjusted match rates over this time were not different for MDs (59% vs 57%, p = 0.22) or DOs (39% vs 37%, p = 0.67). Overall, the unadjusted and adjusted match rate for DO applicants was lower than MD across all years (p < 0.05). For every year except 2023 (p = 0.15), a larger proportion of US DO senior students with ERAS applications did not submit a final NRMP rank list for orthopaedics (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspiring DO orthopaedic surgeons have lower match rates and higher rates of abandoning plans to apply for orthopaedic surgery between ERAS application and NRMP compared with their US MD peers despite single accreditation. Active identification of bias, orthopaedic mentorship, and focused advising may help prepare qualified applicants for competitive specialty matches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

骨科手术仍然是高级西医(MD)和高级正骨医(DO)医学生竞争最激烈的住院医师匹配项目之一。尽管2020年美国正骨协会和毕业后医学教育认证委员会认可的住院医师项目已完成向单一认证的转变,但对于这种新环境对DO和MD骨科申请者的后续影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是使用电子住院医师申请服务(ERAS)和国家住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)的数据评估MD和DO匹配率之间的差异。

方法

从美国医学院协会获取2020年至2023年特定于骨科手术的ERAS申请者数据。查询同一年的NRMP数据。计算并比较每年以及累积的NRMP(未调整)和ERAS(调整后)匹配率。此外,计算并比较高级MD和高级DO申请者组中未在NRMP中对骨科手术进行排名的ERAS申请者比例。

结果

2020年至2023年,MD的未调整匹配率下降(79%对73%,p = 0.002)以及DO的未调整匹配率下降(63%对50%,p = 0.009)。在此期间,MD(59%对57%,p = 0.22)或DO(39%对37%,p = 0.67)的调整后匹配率没有差异。总体而言,所有年份DO申请者的未调整和调整后匹配率均低于MD(p < 0.05)。除2023年外(p = 0.15),每年有更大比例申请ERAS的美国DO高年级学生未提交骨科的最终NRMP排名列表(p < 0.05)。

结论

尽管是单一认证,但与美国MD同行相比,有抱负的DO骨科外科医生在ERAS申请和NRMP之间的匹配率较低,放弃申请骨科手术计划的比例较高。积极识别偏见、骨科指导和针对性建议可能有助于使合格申请者为竞争激烈的专科匹配做好准备。

证据水平

三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

相似文献

3
Comparison of Osteopathic (DO) and Allopathic (MD) Candidates Matching Into Selected Surgical Subspecialties.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 17;15(6):e40566. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40566. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Poor match rates of osteopathic applicants into ACGME dermatology and other competitive specialties.
J Osteopath Med. 2021 Mar 1;121(3):281-286. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0202.
5
Recent and future trends in osteopathic orthopedic surgery residency match rates following the transition to a single accreditation system.
J Osteopath Med. 2025 Jan 23;125(5):237-245. doi: 10.1515/jom-2024-0117. eCollection 2025 May 1.
6
7
Osteopathic Students Have Decreased Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with Allopathic Students.
JB JS Open Access. 2024 Jun 4;9(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00027. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
How Did Black and Hispanic Orthopaedic Applicants and Residents Compare to General Surgery Between 2015 and 2022?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1361-1370. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003069. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Critical Assessment of the Contemporary Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 6;101(21):e114. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00587.

本文引用的文献

1
Does "Hoarding" Impact Interview Distribution Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants? A Modeling Study Based on a Large Database.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Oct 1;481(10):1870-1877. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002795. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Reimagining the Path of an Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Application: A Survey of Program Directors.
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Aug 22;8(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00044. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
4
Acquisition of Medical Knowledge Varies During Allopathic and Osteopathic Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training.
Orthopedics. 2023 Nov-Dec;46(6):379-383. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20230407-03. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Residency Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Based on Sex, Under-Represented in Medicine Status, and Degree Type.
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Mar 22;8(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00143. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
6
Allopathic and Osteopathic Residents Perform Similarly on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE).
J Surg Educ. 2023 May;80(5):714-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
8
The Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine: The Affiliation to Orthopaedic Surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 1;105(3):e9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00275. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
The 2022 Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Leaves Many Qualified Candidates Unmatched.
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jun;38(6):1755-1757. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.028.
10
D.O.s in Adult Reconstruction: A Current Understanding.
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Sep;37(9):1673-1675. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验