Suppr超能文献

持续性室性心动过速患者静脉注射阿义马林和奎尼丁的个体内比较:对正常心肌和心律失常特征的影响

Intraindividual comparison of intravenous ajmaline and quinidine in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia: effects on normal myocardium and on arrhythmia characteristics.

作者信息

Lengfelder W, Senges J, Rizos I, Jauernig R, Brachmann J, von Ohlshausen K, Kübler W

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1985 Apr;6(4):312-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061858.

Abstract

Intraindividual comparison of the acute response to intravenous quinidine and to intravenous ajmaline was performed in 23 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) who underwent serial electrophysiological studies. In each patient, sustained VT could be reproducibly initiated by programmed ventricular stimulation during control studies. Inducibility of sustained VT was prevented after quinidine in 6 of the 23 patients (26%) and after ajmaline in 8 of the same 23 cases (35%). Agreement between the effects of both drugs was not significant: 2 patients had a similar response to both quinidine and ajmaline and 11 patients did not have a response to either of the two drugs, resulting in a total of only 13 patients (57%) who had a similar response to both drugs. In the 11 non-responders with inducible sustained VT before and after both drugs, quinidine and ajmaline caused qualitatively and quantitatively similar alterations of VT characteristics including a significant prolongation of the interval between the initiation extrastimulus and the first beat of VT by 38 and 42% (P less than 0.01), an increase in VT cycle length by 15 and 22% (P less than 0.01) and a prolongation of the QRS duration during VT by 15 and 18% (P less than 0.01), respectively. In all 23 patients, quinidine and ajmaline caused a quantitatively similar prolongation of ventricular refractoriness by 11 and 9% (P less than 0.05), of the QRS duration at sinus rhythm by 10 and 15% (P less than 0.01) and of the QTc interval by 13 and 10% (P less than 0.05), respectively. Thus, ajmaline and quinidine appear to have similar electrophysiological effects on both normal myocardium and on indirect parameters of reentry; in individual patients with sustained VT, however, such electrophysiological similarities do not result in significant agreement of preventive responses.

摘要

对23例持续性室性心动过速(VT)患者进行了静脉注射奎尼丁和静脉注射阿义马林急性反应的个体内比较,这些患者均接受了系列电生理研究。在每项对照研究中,通过程控心室刺激均可重复性诱发每位患者的持续性VT。23例患者中,6例(26%)在使用奎尼丁后持续性VT的诱发被阻止,23例中的8例(35%)在使用阿义马林后持续性VT的诱发被阻止。两种药物作用之间的一致性不显著:2例患者对奎尼丁和阿义马林的反应相似,11例患者对两种药物均无反应,因此总共只有13例患者(57%)对两种药物的反应相似。在11例对两种药物前后均可诱发持续性VT的无反应者中,奎尼丁和阿义马林在定性和定量方面对VT特征产生了相似的改变,包括诱发期外刺激与VT的第一个搏动之间的间期显著延长38%和42%(P<0.01),VT周期长度增加15%和22%(P<0.01),以及VT期间QRS时限分别延长15%和l8%(P<0.01)。在所有23例患者中,奎尼丁和阿义马林使心室不应期分别定量性延长11%和9%(P<0.05),窦性心律时的QRS时限分别延长10%和15%(P<0.01),QTc间期分别延长13%和10%(P<0.05)。因此,阿义马林和奎尼丁对正常心肌和折返间接参数似乎具有相似的电生理作用;然而,在个体持续性VT患者中,这种电生理相似性并未导致预防反应的显著一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验