Suppr超能文献

酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)与组织病理学诊断猫传染性腹膜炎的敏感性和特异性比较

Comparison of Sensitivities and Specificities of ELISA and Histopathology to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis.

作者信息

Saeedi S, Safi S, Mashhadirafiee S, Kabir F, Mortazavi S P

机构信息

Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of veterinary sciences, science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Science, and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Razi Inst. 2024 Oct 31;79(5):1047-1056. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.5.1047. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is one of the most prevalent viral infectious diseases in cats. It presents a number of challenges for veterinarians in terms of diagnosis. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA with that of histopathology. Samples were obtained from 28 cats exhibiting signs consistent with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) at the northwest animal clinics in Tehran, Iran, between January 2013 and 2015. Of the cats examined, five were deemed healthy, 14 exhibited indications of wet FIP, and nine displayed symptoms of dry FIP. Furthermore, the sensitivities and specificities of biochemical parameters were determined. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test for diagnosing effusive FIP were found to be 100%, which was identical to the results obtained from histopathology. The AST (AUC=0.708) and total bilirubin (AUC=0.74) demonstrated moderate clinical accuracy in diagnosing FIP. The optical densities (ODs) in positive cats and the negative control group exhibited no statistically significant difference between the effusive and non-effusive forms of FIP. The Youden index was employed to determine the optimal cut-off point for the ratio of ODs in positive and negative cats, which was estimated to be 3.375. In conclusion, the ELISA demonstrated high predictive values for the diagnosis of effusive FIP and has the potential for use in the serological diagnosis of feline coronavirus infection.

摘要

猫传染性腹膜炎(FIP)是猫中最常见的病毒性传染病之一。在诊断方面,它给兽医带来了诸多挑战。本研究的目的是比较酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)与组织病理学的敏感性和特异性。2013年1月至2015年期间,从伊朗德黑兰西北部动物诊所的28只表现出与猫传染性腹膜炎(FIP)相符症状的猫身上采集样本。在检查的猫中,5只被认为健康,14只表现出湿性FIP的迹象,9只表现出干性FIP的症状。此外,还确定了生化参数的敏感性和特异性。发现ELISA检测诊断渗出性FIP的敏感性和特异性均为100%,这与组织病理学结果相同。谷草转氨酶(AUC = 0.708)和总胆红素(AUC = 0.74)在诊断FIP方面显示出中等的临床准确性。阳性猫和阴性对照组的光密度(ODs)在渗出性和非渗出性FIP形式之间没有统计学上的显著差异。采用尤登指数来确定阳性和阴性猫ODs比值的最佳截断点,估计为3.375。总之,ELISA对渗出性FIP的诊断具有较高的预测价值,并且有潜力用于猫冠状病毒感染的血清学诊断。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sensitivities and Specificities of ELISA and Histopathology to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis.
Arch Razi Inst. 2024 Oct 31;79(5):1047-1056. doi: 10.32592/ARI.2024.79.5.1047. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Detection of feline coronavirus spike gene mutations as a tool to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis.
J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Apr;19(4):321-335. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15623824. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
Immunocytochemistry of mesenteric lymph node fine-needle aspirates in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019 Mar;31(2):210-216. doi: 10.1177/1040638718825280. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Comparison of different tests to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis.
J Vet Intern Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;17(6):781-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02515.x.
10
2022 AAFP/EveryCat Feline Infectious Peritonitis Diagnosis Guidelines.
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Sep;24(9):905-933. doi: 10.1177/1098612X221118761.

本文引用的文献

1
Feline Infectious Peritonitis: European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases Guidelines.
Viruses. 2023 Aug 31;15(9):1847. doi: 10.3390/v15091847.
2
Isolation and Molecular Detection of Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus.
Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Oct 31;77(5):1709-1714. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.357997.2135. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
An updated review of feline coronavirus: mind the two biotypes.
Virus Res. 2023 Mar;326:199059. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2023.199059. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
4
2022 AAFP/EveryCat Feline Infectious Peritonitis Diagnosis Guidelines.
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Sep;24(9):905-933. doi: 10.1177/1098612X221118761.
7
Global biochemical analysis of plasma, serum and whole blood collected using various anticoagulant additives.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249797. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验