Suppr超能文献

超声处理在骨折相关感染中的应用价值

Utility of Sonication for Fracture-Related Infection.

作者信息

Liu Christina, Gregg Austin T, Moye Stephen C, Fischer Alina, Akodu Michael, Appleton Paul, Rodriguez Edward K, Wixted John

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Department of Orthopedics, Beth Israel Health, 3330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the utility of sonication compared to traditional tissue culture in the setting of fracture-related infections (FRIs).

METHODS

Design: Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

One Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with prior fracture fixation that required a reoperation for suspected infection, nonunion, or hardware failure with available sonication data between 2018 and 2023 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome was positivity of sonication compared to traditional tissue culture. FRI was diagnosed based on clinical FRI diagnosis by the treating team in collaboration with infectious disease specialists. Secondary aims were to identify specificity and sensitivity of sonication and tissue culture and patient-specific factors associated with positive sonication in the setting of negative tissue culture.

RESULTS

Of 79 patients identified, 67 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 57 years (IQR: 43-72), and 50% were female. Most fractures were in the lower extremity (85%), and 73% were treated with plate fixation. Eighteen patients had positive tissue cultures, of which 15 were positive on sonication. Forty-nine patients had negative tissue cultures. Twenty-seven patients (40%) had positive sonication. Thirty cases were classified as FRI. Patients with positive sonication with negative tissue cultures were more likely male (66.6% vs. 32.4%, p=0.048), older (65.5 vs. 55.7 years, p=0.045), and had higher reoperation rates for suspected infection (50% vs. 13.5%, p=0.0093) compared to negative sonication. Sonication demonstrated a higher sensitivity (80% vs. 56%) and lower specificity (92% vs. 97%) than tissue culture for FRI detection. The total sonication cost was $229 per patient compared to $122 for standard tissue cultures.

CONCLUSION

Sonication demonstrated higher sensitivity for FRI detection compared to traditional tissue culture. Given its minimal additional cost and higher sensitivity, sonication is recommended as an adjunct diagnostic tool in reoperations for suspected orthopedic infections, hardware failure, and nonunion of unclear etiology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV.

摘要

目的

确定在骨折相关感染(FRI)情况下,与传统组织培养相比,超声处理的效用。

方法

设计:回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家一级创伤中心。

患者选择标准

纳入2018年至2023年间因疑似感染、骨不连或内固定失败而需要再次手术且有可用超声处理数据的既往骨折内固定患者。

结局指标及比较

主要结局是超声处理与传统组织培养相比的阳性率。FRI由治疗团队与传染病专家合作根据临床FRI诊断确定。次要目标是确定超声处理和组织培养的特异性和敏感性,以及在组织培养阴性情况下与超声处理阳性相关的患者特异性因素。

结果

在确定的79例患者中,67例符合纳入标准。平均年龄为57岁(四分位间距:43 - 72岁),50%为女性。大多数骨折发生在下肢(85%),73%接受钢板固定。18例患者组织培养阳性,其中15例超声处理阳性。49例患者组织培养阴性。27例患者(40%)超声处理阳性。30例被归类为FRI。与超声处理阴性的患者相比,组织培养阴性但超声处理阳性的患者更可能为男性(66.6%对32.4%,p = 0.048)、年龄更大(65.5岁对55.7岁,p = 0.045),且因疑似感染进行再次手术的比例更高(50%对13.5%,p = 0.0093)。对于FRI检测,超声处理显示出比组织培养更高的敏感性(80%对56%)和更低的特异性(92%对97%)。每位患者的超声处理总费用为229美元,而标准组织培养为122美元。

结论

与传统组织培养相比,超声处理对FRI检测显示出更高的敏感性。鉴于其额外成本最低且敏感性更高,建议将超声处理作为疑似骨科感染、内固定失败和病因不明的骨不连再次手术中的辅助诊断工具。

证据水平

诊断性IV级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验