• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000 - 2023年美国孕产妇、胎儿及婴儿死亡率趋势

Trends in Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Mortality in the US, 2000-2023.

作者信息

Park Robin Y, Bilinski Alyssa, Parks Robbie M, Flaxman Seth

机构信息

Department of Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Departments of Health Services, Policy & Practice and Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0440.

DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0440
PMID:40293755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038713/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accurately measuring maternal mortality trends has been challenging due to changes in data collection. This work disambiguates trends from the effects of introducing the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates and also analyzes closely related fetal and infant mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To describe trends in maternal, fetal, and infant deaths since 2000, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A national, population-level, epidemiological, cross-sectional analysis during 2000 to 2023 was conducted as well as a staggered difference-in-differences analysis on the pregnancy checkbox, using the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database on underlying causes of death in the US to identify maternal, infant, and fetal deaths. Study population was restricted to mothers aged 15 to 44 years for all definitions of maternal mortality.

EXPOSURES

Staggered introduction of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates across different states.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Longitudinal study (2000-2023) reporting crude rates per 100 000 population for adjusted maternal mortality and per 1000 population for fetal and infant mortality at the national level and by US Census Bureau-designated main census regions, age groups, and race and ethnicity. Staggered difference-in-differences counterfactuals (1999-2023) on impact of pregnancy checkbox.

RESULTS

The introduction of the pregnancy checkbox was associated with 6.78 (95% CI, 1.47-12.09) deaths per 100 000 live births increase in reported maternal mortality, 66% (95% CI, 14%-117%) of the total increase from 2000 to 2019, with a smaller impact on maternal mortality excluding cause unspecified (adjusted maternal death rates). Adjusted maternal death rates remained consistently between 6.75 (95% CI, 5.97-7.61) to 10.24 (95% CI, 9.22-11.34) per 100 000 live births from 2000 until 2021, when it peaked at 18.86 (95% CI, 17.48-20.32); the rate dropped to 10.23 (95% CI, 9.22-11.32) in 2022. The death rates of Native American or Alaska Native women increased the most during the COVID-19 period, almost tripling from 2011 to 2019 (10.70 per 100 000 live births; 95% CI, 7.64-14.57) to the 2020 to 2022 period (27.47 per 100 000 live births; 95% CI, 18.39-39.45). The death rates of non-Hispanic Black women were highest across time-approximately triple the rate of non-Hispanic White women in each time period. Infant death rates per 1000 live births dropped from 6.93 (95% CI, 6.85-7.01) in 2000 to 5.44 (95% CI, 5.36-5.51) in 2020, increasing slightly to 2018 levels in 2021 to 2023. Fetal death rates per 1000 live births decreased from 6.28 (95% CI, 6.16-6.31) in 2005 to 5.53 (95% CI, 5.45-5.60) in 2022.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Using difference-in-differences analyses, results of this study reveal that the pregnancy checkbox explained much of the observed increase in maternal mortality before the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, results of this cross-sectional study suggest that, even adjusting for pregnancy checkbox effects, most groups saw increases from 2011 to 2019 to the 2020 to 2022 period, indicating that the COVID-19 pandemic led to worse outcomes. The findings demonstrate the relevance of public health emergencies to maternal health outcomes.

摘要

重要性

由于数据收集方式的变化,准确衡量孕产妇死亡率趋势一直具有挑战性。这项工作消除了引入死亡证明上的怀孕复选框对趋势的影响,并分析了密切相关的胎儿和婴儿死亡率。

目的

描述2000年以来孕产妇、胎儿和婴儿死亡的趋势,包括COVID-19大流行的影响。

设计、背景和参与者:对2000年至2023年进行了一项全国性、人口水平的流行病学横断面分析,并对怀孕复选框进行了交错差分分析,使用美国疾病控制与预防中心的广泛在线流行病学研究数据(WONDER)数据库中美国潜在死因来识别孕产妇、婴儿和胎儿死亡。所有孕产妇死亡率定义的研究人群仅限于15至44岁的母亲。

暴露因素

不同州在死亡证明上交错引入怀孕复选框。

主要结局和指标

纵向研究(2000 - 2023年)报告全国层面以及按美国人口普查局指定的主要普查区域、年龄组、种族和族裔划分的每10万人口的调整后孕产妇死亡率以及每1000人口的胎儿和婴儿死亡率的粗率。对怀孕复选框影响的交错差分反事实分析(1999 - 2023年)。

结果

引入怀孕复选框与报告的孕产妇死亡率每10万活产增加6.78例(95%可信区间,1.47 - 12.09)相关,占2000年至2019年总增加量的66%(95%可信区间,14% - 117%),对未指定原因的孕产妇死亡率(调整后的孕产妇死亡率)影响较小。从2000年到2021年,调整后的孕产妇死亡率始终保持在每1万活产6.75例(95%可信区间,5.97 - 7.61)至10.24例(95%可信区间,9.22 - 11.34)之间,2021年达到峰值18.86例(95%可信区间,17.48 - 20.32);2022年降至10.23例(95%可信区间,9.22 - 11.32)。在COVID - 19期间,美国原住民或阿拉斯加原住民妇女的死亡率上升幅度最大,从2011年到2019年几乎增加了两倍(每10万活产10.70例;95%可信区间,7.64 - 14.57)到2020年至2022年期间(每10万活产27.47例;95%可信区间,18.39 - 39.45)。非西班牙裔黑人妇女的死亡率在各时间段均最高,约为每个时间段非西班牙裔白人妇女死亡率的三倍。每1000活产的婴儿死亡率从2000年的6.93例(95%可信区间,6.85 - 7.01)降至2020年的5.44例(95%可信区间,5.36 - 5.51),在2021年至2023年略有上升至2018年的水平。每1000活产的胎儿死亡率从2005年的6.28例(95%可信区间,6.16 - 6.3)降至2022年的5.53例(95%可信区间,5.45 - 5.6)。

结论与意义

使用差分分析,本研究结果表明,怀孕复选框解释了COVID - 19大流行之前观察到的孕产妇死亡率增加的大部分原因。然而,这项横断面研究的结果表明,即使调整了怀孕复选框的影响,大多数群体在2011年至2019年到2020年至2022年期间仍有所增加,这表明COVID - 19大流行导致了更糟糕的结果。研究结果证明了公共卫生紧急情况与孕产妇健康结果的相关性。

相似文献

1
Trends in Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Mortality in the US, 2000-2023.2000 - 2023年美国孕产妇、胎儿及婴儿死亡率趋势
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0440.
2
Trends in State-Level Maternal Mortality by Racial and Ethnic Group in the United States.美国按种族和民族划分的州级孕产妇死亡率趋势。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 3;330(1):52-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9043.
3
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
4
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV infection in ART-eligible pregnant women.用于治疗符合抗逆转录病毒治疗条件的孕妇艾滋病毒感染的抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD008440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008440.
5
Life Expectancy of American Indian and Alaska Native Persons and Underreporting of Mortality in Vital Statistics.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的预期寿命以及生命统计中死亡率的漏报情况。
JAMA. 2025 Jul 15;334(3):243-252. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.8126.
6
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.连续胎心监护(CTG)作为一种电子胎儿监护(EFM)形式,用于分娩期间的胎儿评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 3;2(2):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.
7
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Age-Specific All-Cause Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠大流行期间特定年龄段全因死亡率的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38918.
9
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
10
Regimens of ultrasound surveillance for twin pregnancies for improving outcomes.改善双胎妊娠结局的超声监测方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 7;11(11):CD011371. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011371.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between state-level abortion policy and maternal mortality in the United States: a scoping review.美国州级堕胎政策与孕产妇死亡率之间的关系:一项范围综述
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Aug 14;3(8):qxaf146. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf146. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic racism and Non-Hispanic Black to Non-Hispanic White disparities in infant mortality at the county level.系统性种族主义和非西班牙裔黑人群体与非西班牙裔白人群体在县级婴儿死亡率方面的差异。
J Perinatol. 2024 Dec;44(12):1724-1731. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02048-5. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance?美国的孕产妇死亡率:如此之高且不断上升的比率是由于产科因素、产妇医疗状况还是孕产妇死亡率监测的变化所致?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):440.e1-440.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.038. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
US Trends in Maternal Mortality by Racial and Ethnic Group-Reply.按种族和族裔群体划分的美国孕产妇死亡率趋势——回复
JAMA. 2023 Nov 14;330(18):1800-1801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.17550.
4
The Racial Disparities in Maternal Mortality and Impact of Structural Racism and Implicit Racial Bias on Pregnant Black Women: A Review of the Literature.种族差异与孕产妇死亡率:结构种族主义和隐性种族偏见对怀孕黑人妇女的影响:文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec;11(6):3658-3677. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01816-x. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
Measuring US Maternal Mortality.衡量美国孕产妇死亡率。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 14;330(18):1731-1732. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19945.
6
Fetal Mortality: United States, 2021.胎儿死亡:美国,2021 年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 Jul;72(8):1-21.
7
Trends in State-Level Maternal Mortality by Racial and Ethnic Group in the United States.美国按种族和民族划分的州级孕产妇死亡率趋势。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 3;330(1):52-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9043.
8
Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups in England from 2020 to 2022: a retrospective cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform.2020 年至 2022 年期间英格兰与关键人口统计学和临床亚组相关的 COVID-19 死亡率变化:使用 OpenSAFELY 平台的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 May;8(5):e364-e377. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00079-8.
9
Trends in fetal and neonatal outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Alabama.美国阿拉巴马州 COVID-19 大流行期间胎儿和新生儿结局的变化趋势。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Aug;94(2):756-761. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02533-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Adverse maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis.孕妇感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)后的母婴和新生儿不良结局:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009495.