Fahmy Ahmad, Ahmed Masih, Pflugfelder Stephen, Serikbaeva Anara, Tsao Fang-Wei
Minnesota Eye Consultants, Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA.
Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Aug;41(6):293-304. doi: 10.1089/jop.2024.0192. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by disruption of tear film homeostasis, resulting in ocular surface inflammation and damage. Although several Food and Drug Administration-approved topical treatments are available, direct comparisons of their efficacy and safety are complicated by variability in study designs and corneal staining grading scales. This review systematically evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of topical therapies approved in the United States, focusing on anti-inflammatory and semi-fluorinated alkane (SFA)-based therapies. A systematic literature review identified 12 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6,984 patients with varying severity of DED eligible for inclusion, with 8 providing data suitable for quantitative meta-analysis and 5 for exploratory regression analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA showed the most significant early improvement (within ≤4 weeks) in total corneal fluorescein staining, outperforming other treatments. Exploratory regression analysis further supported these findings, demonstrating that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA had the fastest and most consistent reduction in corneal staining, with the steepest improvement slope and strong predictability ( = 0.871). Safety analyses highlighted improved local tolerability for SFA-based therapies compared with traditional anti-inflammatory treatments, notably lower instillation site discomfort for both cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA (2.5%-9.9%) and perfluorohexyloctane (≤1%) vs. other cyclosporine formulations. SFA-based therapies, especially cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA, demostrated robust efficacy in improving signs of DED with superior tolerability profiles compared to traditional anti-inflammatory treatments. These findings support the role in effectively managing ocular surface inflammation and optimizing treatment strategies in DED.
干眼疾病(DED)是一种多因素疾病,其特征是泪膜稳态破坏,导致眼表炎症和损伤。尽管有几种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的局部治疗方法,但由于研究设计和角膜染色分级量表的差异,对它们的疗效和安全性进行直接比较很复杂。本综述系统地评估和比较了美国批准的局部治疗方法的疗效和安全性,重点是基于抗炎和半氟化烷烃(SFA)的治疗方法。一项系统的文献综述确定了12项随机对照试验,总共纳入了6984例不同严重程度的DED患者,其中8项提供了适合定量荟萃分析的数据,5项提供了适合探索性回归分析的数据。荟萃分析表明,0.1%环孢素/SFA在角膜总荧光素染色方面显示出最显著的早期改善(≤4周内),优于其他治疗方法。探索性回归分析进一步支持了这些发现,表明0.1%环孢素/SFA在角膜染色减少方面最快且最一致,改善斜率最陡且预测性强( = 0.871)。安全性分析强调,与传统抗炎治疗相比,基于SFA的治疗方法局部耐受性有所改善,特别是0.1%环孢素/SFA(2.5%-9.9%)和全氟己基辛烷(≤1%)的滴注部位不适低于其他环孢素制剂。与传统抗炎治疗相比,基于SFA的治疗方法,尤其是0.1%环孢素/SFA,在改善DED症状方面显示出强大的疗效,且耐受性更好。这些发现支持了其在有效管理眼表炎症和优化DED治疗策略方面的作用。