Suppr超能文献

考察肯尼亚国家医疗保险基金成员对签约门诊设施属性的偏好及权衡:一项离散选择实验

Examining national health insurance fund members' preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Kazungu Jacob, Barasa Edwine, Nonvignon Justice, Quaife Matthew

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(4):e0003557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003557. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Patient choice of health facilities is increasingly gaining recognition for potentially enhancing the attainment of health system goals globally. In Kenya, National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) members are required to choose an NHIF-contracted outpatient facility before accessing care. Understanding their preferences could support resource allocation decisions, enhance the provision of patient-centered care, and deepen NHIF's purchasing decisions. We employed a discrete choice experiment to examine NHIF members' preferences for attributes of NHIF-contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya. We developed a d-efficient experimental design with six attributes, namely availability of drugs, distance from household to facility, waiting time at the facility until consultation, cleanliness of the facility, attitude of health worker, and cadre of health workers seen during consultation. Data were then collected from 402 NHIF members in six out of 47 counties. Choice data were analysed using panel mixed multinomial logit and latent class models. NHIF members preferred NHIF-contracted outpatient facilities that always had drugs [β=1.572], were closer to their households [β=-0.082], had shorter waiting times [β=-0.195], had respectful staff [β=1.249] and had either clinical officers [β=0.478] or medical doctors [β=1.525] for consultation. NHIF members indicated a willingness to accept travel 17.8km if drugs were always available, 17.7km to see a medical doctor for consultation, and 14.6km to see respectful health workers. Furthermore, NHIF members indicated a willingness to wait at a facility for 8.9 hours to ensure the availability of drugs, 8.8 hours to see a doctor for consultation, and 7.2 hours to see respectful health workers. Understanding NHIF member preferences and trade-offs can inform resource allocation at counties, service provision across providers, and purchasing decisions of purchasers such as the recently formed social health insurance authority in Kenya as a move towards UHC.

摘要

患者对医疗设施的选择对于在全球范围内潜在地促进卫生系统目标的实现越来越受到认可。在肯尼亚,国家健康保险基金(NHIF)成员在获得医疗服务之前,必须选择一家与NHIF签约的门诊设施。了解他们的偏好有助于做出资源分配决策、加强以患者为中心的医疗服务提供,并深化NHIF的采购决策。我们采用离散选择实验来研究肯尼亚NHIF成员对与NHIF签约的门诊设施属性的偏好。我们开发了一个具有六个属性的d效率实验设计,即药品供应情况、家庭到设施的距离、在设施等待直至会诊的时间、设施的清洁程度、医护人员的态度以及会诊时见到的医护人员类别。然后从47个县中的6个县的402名NHIF成员那里收集了数据。使用面板混合多项logit模型和潜在类别模型对选择数据进行了分析。NHIF成员更喜欢那些总是有药品的[β = 1.572]、离家庭更近的[β = -0.082]、等待时间更短的[β = -0.195]、员工态度恭敬的[β = 1.249]以及会诊时有临床干事[β = 0.478]或医生[β = 1.525]的与NHIF签约的门诊设施。NHIF成员表示,如果药品总是有供应,他们愿意接受前往17.8公里外的设施;为了看医生会诊,愿意前往17.7公里外的地方;为了见到态度恭敬的医护人员,愿意前往14.6公里外的地方。此外,NHIF成员表示愿意在设施等待8.9小时以确保有药品供应,8.8小时以看医生会诊,7.2小时以见到态度恭敬的医护人员。了解NHIF成员的偏好和权衡取舍,可以为各县的资源分配、各医疗机构的服务提供以及采购方(如肯尼亚最近成立的社会健康保险机构)的采购决策提供信息,这是朝着全民健康覆盖迈进的一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2530/12036850/f7ce07153555/pgph.0003557.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验