Furrer Marc A, Sathianathen Niranjan J, Mulholland Clancy J, Papa Nathan, Katsios Andreas, Soliman Christopher, Lawrentschuk Nathan, Peters Justin S, Zargar Homi, Costello Anthony J, Hovens Christopher M, Liodakis Peter, Bishop Conrad, Rao Ranjit, Tong Raymond, Steiner Daniel, Murphy Declan G, Moon Daniel, Thomas Benjamin C, Dundee Philip, Goad Jeremy, Rodriguez Calero Jose Antonio, Thalmann George N, Corcoran Niall
Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Urology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Urol. 2025 Apr 28:101097JU0000000000004587. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004587.
With the availability of PSMA-PET scans, it is controversial whether pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) is still the most reliable and accurate staging modality for lymph node assessment. Furthermore, the oncological benefit of PLND remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess whether omitting PLND in patients undergoing RP for prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with the risk of tumor recurrence and progression to metastasis.
In this longitudinal multicenter cohort study, we reviewed data of 2346 consecutive patients with PCa who underwent RP with (n = 1650) and without (n = 696) extended PLND between January 1996 and December 2021. Recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were analyzed as a time-to-event outcome using Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests. To assess the effect of PLND, we created multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for relevant clinical and demographic characteristics.
Median follow-up was 44 months. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival between men who had a PLND and those who did not (HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.87-1.32, = .52). Patients with D'Amico high-risk disease (PSA >20 µg/L and/or International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥4) demonstrated a significantly prolonged MFS if they underwent PLND (HR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.36-0.91, = .02). PLND also improved MFS in patients with intermediate-risk disease (HR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.25-0.90, = .023). Further significant prognostic variables for MFS on multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were PSA, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group, and pathological T-stage.
PLND improves MFS in patients with D'Amico intermediate-risk and high-risk PCa and may therefore be considered in men undergoing RP.
随着PSMA-PET扫描的应用,根治性前列腺切除术(RP)时盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)是否仍是评估淋巴结最可靠、准确的分期方式存在争议。此外,PLND的肿瘤学益处仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估前列腺癌(PCa)患者在接受RP时省略PLND是否与肿瘤复发和进展为转移的风险相关。
在这项纵向多中心队列研究中,我们回顾了1996年1月至2021年12月期间2346例连续接受RP的PCa患者的数据,其中1650例接受了扩大PLND,696例未接受。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验将无复发生存率和无转移生存率(MFS)作为事件发生时间结局进行分析。为评估PLND的效果,我们创建了多变量Cox比例风险模型,对相关临床和人口统计学特征进行调整。
中位随访时间为44个月。接受PLND的男性与未接受PLND的男性在无复发生存率方面无差异(风险比[HR],1.07;95%置信区间[CI],0.87-1.32;P = 0.52)。D’Amico高危疾病(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]>20 μg/L和/或国际泌尿病理学会分级组≥4)患者若接受PLND,其MFS显著延长(HR,0.57;95%CI,0.36-0.91;P = 0.02)。PLND也改善了中危疾病患者的MFS(HR,0.48;95%CI,0.25-0.90;P = 0.023)。多变量Cox比例风险回归中MFS的其他显著预后变量为PSA、国际泌尿病理学会分级组和病理T分期。
PLND可改善D’Amico中危和高危PCa患者的MFS,因此对于接受RP的男性可考虑采用。