Touijer Karim A, Vertosick Emily A, Sjoberg Daniel D, Liso Nicole, Nalavenkata Sunny, Melao Barbara, Laudone Vincent P, Ehdaie Behfar, Carver Brett, Eastham James A, Scardino Peter T, Vickers Andrew J
Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Lymph node dissection (LND) has been standard in cancer surgery for more than a century, yet evidence from randomized trials showing a benefit is scarce. We conducted a clinically integrated randomized trial comparing limited versus extended pelvic LND (PLND) during radical prostatectomy and previously reported comparable biochemical recurrence (BCR) rates. We report updated BCR rates and compare rates of metastasis between the study arms.
Between October 2011 and March 2017, 1432 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were enrolled at a single center. Surgeons were cluster randomized to perform limited (external iliac nodes) or extended PLND (external iliac, obturator, and hypogastric nodes) with crossover for 3-mo periods. Cox proportional-hazards regression with robust standard errors clustered by surgeon was used to assess whether the PLND template affected BCR or distant or locoregional metastasis.
There were 452 BCR events at median follow-up of 4.2 yr for participants who did not develop BCR. The results confirm our previous finding of comparable BCR rates between the arms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.13; p = 0.3). However, with 123 metastasis events and median follow-up of 5.4 yr for patients without metastasis, we found a clinically and statistically significant protective effect of extended PLND against metastasis (any metastasis: HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.93; p = 0.003; distant metastasis: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.88; p < 0.001).
Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy should receive extended PLND that includes the external iliac, obturator, and hypogastric nodes. Further research should examine biological mechanisms regarding the anatomic location of affected nodes. Trials of LND for other cancers are warranted and should consider our clinically integrated design. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01407263.
淋巴结清扫术(LND)在癌症手术中作为标准术式已应用了一个多世纪,但随机试验显示其有益处的证据却很稀少。我们开展了一项临床综合随机试验,比较根治性前列腺切除术中有限盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)与扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术,并报告了之前可比的生化复发(BCR)率。我们报告了更新后的BCR率,并比较了研究组之间的转移率。
2011年10月至2017年3月期间,1432例接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者在单一中心入组。外科医生被整群随机分组,进行有限(髂外淋巴结)或扩大PLND(髂外、闭孔和下腹下淋巴结),为期3个月交叉进行。采用Cox比例风险回归分析,按外科医生聚类稳健标准误,以评估PLND模板是否影响BCR或远处或局部区域转移。
在未发生BCR的参与者中,中位随访4.2年时有452例BCR事件。结果证实了我们之前的发现,即两组之间的BCR率相当(风险比[HR]1.05,95%置信区间[CI]0.97 - 1.13;p = 0.3)。然而,在无转移患者中,有123例转移事件,中位随访5.4年,我们发现扩大PLND对转移具有临床和统计学上的显著保护作用(任何转移:HR 0.82,95% CI 0.71 - 0.93;p = 0.003;远处转移:HR 0.75,95% CI 0.64 - 0.88;p < 0.001)。
接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者应接受包括髂外、闭孔和下腹下淋巴结的扩大PLND。进一步的研究应探讨有关受累淋巴结解剖位置的生物学机制。对其他癌症进行LND试验是必要的,并且应考虑我们的临床综合设计。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01407263。