Llombart-Cussac Antonio, Harper-Wynne Catherine, Perelló Antonia, Hennequin Audrey, Fernández-Ortega Adela, Colleoni Marco, Marín Sara, Quiroga Vanesa, Medioni Jacques, Iranzo Vega, Wheatley Duncan, Del Barco Berrón Sonia, Antón Antonio, Dobi Erion, Ruiz-Borrego Manuel, Alcalá-López Daniel, Pérez-Escuredo Jhudit, Antonarelli Gabriele, Sampayo-Cordero Miguel, Pérez-García José Manuel, Cortés Javier
Medica Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, FISABIO, Valencia, Spain.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 28:JCO2401865. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01865.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) represents the standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, there is no definitive consensus on the preferred second-line treatment option. The PALMIRA trial investigated whether palbociclib rechallenge with an alternative ET would improve the antitumor activity in patients progressing after a first-line palbociclib-containing regimen.
This international, randomized, open-label, phase II study enrolled 198 patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative ABC with disease progression after first-line palbociclib plus ET (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant). Patients were eligible if they showed clinical benefit to the previous regimen (response or stable disease ≥24 weeks) or had progressed on a palbociclib-based therapy in the adjuvant setting. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to either palbociclib rechallenge plus second-line ET (fulvestrant or letrozole) or second-line ET alone. Stratification factors were previous ET and visceral involvement. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).
Between April 2019 and October 2022, 136 and 62 patients were randomly assigned to palbociclib plus ET or ET alone, respectively. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 6.1) with palbociclib plus ET versus 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.2) with ET alone (hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.07]; = .149). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were higher with palbociclib plus ET (47.4% 10.0%), without new safety signals.
Palbociclib rechallenge plus an alternative ET did not significantly improve PFS compared with ET alone in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative ABC progressing on a first-line palbociclib-based ET regimen.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK4/6)抑制剂联合内分泌治疗(ET)是激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2阴性)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的标准一线治疗方案。然而,对于首选的二线治疗方案尚无明确共识。PALMIRA试验研究了在含哌柏西利的一线治疗方案后进展的患者中,再次使用哌柏西利联合另一种ET是否会提高抗肿瘤活性。
这项国际、随机、开放标签的II期研究纳入了198例激素受体阳性/HER2阴性ABC患者,这些患者在一线接受哌柏西利联合ET(芳香化酶抑制剂或氟维司群)治疗后疾病进展。如果患者对先前的治疗方案显示出临床获益(缓解或疾病稳定≥24周)或在辅助治疗中接受基于哌柏西利的治疗后病情进展,则符合入选标准。患者按2:1的比例随机分配至再次使用哌柏西利联合二线ET(氟维司群或来曲唑)组或仅接受二线ET组。分层因素为先前的ET和内脏受累情况。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。
2019年4月至2022年10月期间,分别有136例和62例患者被随机分配至哌柏西利联合ET组或仅接受ET组。研究者评估的哌柏西利联合ET组的中位PFS为4.9个月(95%CI,3.6至6.1),而仅接受ET组为3.6个月(95%CI,2.5至4.2)(风险比,0.84[95%CI,0.66至1.07];P = 0.149)。哌柏西利联合ET组≥3级治疗中出现的不良事件发生率更高(47.4%对10.0%),且无新的安全信号。
在一线接受基于哌柏西利的ET方案治疗后进展的激素受体阳性/HER2阴性ABC患者中,再次使用哌柏西利联合另一种ET与仅接受ET相比,并未显著改善PFS。