Kanjoor James Roy, De Sousa Reuben Fernando, Subramaniam Sangeetha
Roys Cosmetic Surgery Centre, No.20, Globe Building, Eru Company, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641043, India.
Healthways Hospital, Plot No 132/1 (Part), Ella Village, Kadamba Plateau, Old Goa, Goa, 403402, India.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04867-z.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is commonly performed in ambulatory aesthetic surgery centers. The authors compared combination of TIVA and tumescent anesthesia for safety and efficacy in prolonged and successive multiple aesthetic procedures.
A retrospective review of patients who underwent aesthetic surgery procedures under TIVA from 2016 through 2024 at the authors' aesthetic surgery center was conducted. Patients were included if they fulfilled ASA 1 or 2 staging, BMI < 45 and were of age between 12 and 80 years. Perioperative drug dosages, time under anesthesia and patient vitals were recorded.
Of the 307 patients assessed, 301 completed surgery under TIVA and 6 were converted to GA. No major morbidity was recorded and all 307 cases were discharged from Anesthesia Recovery at 6 hours post-surgery. Average duration of anesthesia time was highest for lipoabdominoplasty (278 min, range 170-360 min). Average dose of tumescent anesthesia was highest in excisional body contouring (2967 ml). No surgical morbidity, e.g., skin necrosis, hematoma and blood transfusion, was reported. No anesthetic morbidity, e.g., deep vein thrombosis, fat embolism and lignocaine toxicity, was reported. Mean arterial pressure and SpO2 were maintained in safe normal range (70-100 mm Hg and > 95%, respectively) up to 6 hours postoperative. Aldrete score for postoperative recovery was > =9 at 10 min for 80% cases (n= 245).
The analysis of 307 total intravenous anesthesia with tumescent anesthesia cases demonstrated the overall safety and efficacy of the propofol-dexmedetomidine protocol under deep sedation. The study underscores the importance of complete preoperative assessments, vigilant anesthetist-guided drug infusions and monitoring for complications.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
全静脉麻醉(TIVA)常用于门诊美容手术中心。作者比较了TIVA与肿胀麻醉联合应用于长时间连续多次美容手术的安全性和有效性。
对2016年至2024年在作者所在美容手术中心接受TIVA下美容手术的患者进行回顾性研究。符合美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1或2级分级、体重指数(BMI)<45且年龄在12至80岁之间的患者纳入研究。记录围手术期药物剂量、麻醉时间和患者生命体征。
在评估的307例患者中,301例在TIVA下完成手术,6例转为全身麻醉(GA)。未记录到严重并发症,所有307例患者均在术后6小时从麻醉恢复室出院。腹部抽脂术的平均麻醉时间最长(278分钟,范围170 - 360分钟)。切除性身体塑形术中肿胀麻醉的平均剂量最高(2967毫升)。未报告手术并发症,如皮肤坏死、血肿和输血。未报告麻醉并发症,如深静脉血栓形成、脂肪栓塞和利多卡因毒性。术后平均动脉压和血氧饱和度(SpO2)在术后6小时内维持在安全正常范围内(分别为70 - 100毫米汞柱和>95%)。80%的病例(n = 245)术后10分钟的Aldrete恢复评分>=9分。
对307例TIVA联合肿胀麻醉病例的分析表明,丙泊酚 - 右美托咪定方案在深度镇静下总体安全有效。该研究强调了术前全面评估、麻醉师指导下谨慎的药物输注以及并发症监测的重要性。
证据级别III:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。