Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑-氟马西尼与丙泊酚用于小儿斜视矫正全身麻醉时的苏醒情况:一项随机临床试验

Emergence profiles of remimazolam-flumazenil versus propofol in pediatric general anesthesia for strabismus correction: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Qin Jinling, Gan Wei, Liu Qun, Zhang Xiaolin, Li Xiaoyu, Lu Bo, Shen Qing

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo Aier Guangming Eye Hospital, Zhejiang, 315020, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03050-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam (Rm) is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used in general anesthesia. However, its application in pediatric general anesthesia remains limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and postoperative emergence profiles of remimazolam and propofol (Pf) in pediatric surgical anesthesia.

METHODS

Children (aged 3-12 years) undergoing strabismus correction surgery were randomly assigned to the Group Rm or the Group Pf. The Group Rm and Group Pf received an induction dose of 0.3 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, respectively. For emergence, the Group Rm was administered flumazenil 0.2-0.3 mg. The primary outcome was the time from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to the first eye opening. Secondary outcomes included the time from the end of surgery to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) removal, the time to achieve a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of 5 after LMA removal, and Aldrete scores during the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) stay. Additionally, the changes of vital signs before and after anesthesia were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In all patients, both remimazolam and propofol induced anesthesia successfully. Regarding emergence profiles, the Group Rm had significantly shorter times to first eye opening, LMA removal, and achieving an MOAA/S score of 5 post-LMA removal compared to the Group Pf (p < 0.001). Upon arrival at the PACU, the number of patients with Aldrete scores ≥ 9 was significantly higher in the Group Rm (p < 0.001). Following injection, the reduction in DBP was significantly greater in the Group Pf compared to the Group Rm (p < 0.001). The Group Rm maintained a more stable HR compared to the Group Pf.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam provides more stable hemodynamic characteristics and significantly shorter postoperative emergence time in pediatric patients compared to propofol. This suggests that remimazolam may be more suitable than propofol for pediatric general anesthesia, though larger scale clinical trials are needed for further validation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400083265.

摘要

背景

瑞马唑仑(Rm)是一种用于全身麻醉的新型超短效苯二氮䓬类药物。然而,其在小儿全身麻醉中的应用仍然有限。本研究旨在比较瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚(Pf)在小儿外科麻醉中的疗效、安全性及术后苏醒情况。

方法

将接受斜视矫正手术的3至12岁儿童随机分为Rm组和Pf组。Rm组和Pf组分别接受0.3mg/kg和2mg/kg的诱导剂量。在苏醒时,Rm组给予0.2 - 0.3mg氟马西尼。主要结局指标是从停用麻醉药到首次睁眼的时间。次要结局指标包括从手术结束到拔除喉罩气道(LMA)的时间、拔除LMA后达到改良观察警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S)为5分的时间以及麻醉后护理单元(PACU)停留期间的Aldrete评分。此外,比较两组麻醉前后生命体征的变化。

结果

在所有患者中,瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚均成功诱导麻醉。关于苏醒情况,与Pf组相比,Rm组首次睁眼、拔除LMA以及拔除LMA后达到MOAA/S评分为5分的时间显著更短(p < 0.001)。到达PACU时,Rm组Aldrete评分≥9分的患者数量显著更多(p < 0.001)。注射后,Pf组舒张压的下降幅度显著大于Rm组(p < 0.001)。与Pf组相比,Rm组维持更稳定的心率。

结论

与丙泊酚相比,瑞马唑仑在小儿患者中具有更稳定的血流动力学特征,术后苏醒时间显著更短。这表明瑞马唑仑可能比丙泊酚更适合小儿全身麻醉,不过需要更大规模的临床试验进行进一步验证。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2400083265

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/590e/12036173/4a726da2e98c/12871_2025_3050_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验