Suppr超能文献

不同剂量瑞米唑仑在老年患者区域神经阻滞麻醉中的镇静效果

The sedation efficacy of different doses of remimazolam in elderly patients with regional nerve block anaesthesia.

作者信息

Yang Wan-Jun, Geng Zhi-Long, Chen Zheng-Ze, Cui Chao-Yuan, Tian Zi-Wei, Guo Xi-Lin, Zhang Ya-Nan, Wang Lu, Huo Rui, Ma Chen-Wei, Gao Yuan-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02204-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative that is indicated for induction and maintenance during general anaesthesia. Remimazolam is also used for sedation in outpatient surgery; however, most reports have focused on nonelderly patients, whereas only a few studies have reported the use of remimazolam for elderly patients when receiving regional nerve block anaesthesia.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remimazolam in elderly patients when specifically related to regional nerve block anaesthesia.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 80 patients aged 65 years or older under regional nerve block anaesthesia. After the effects of anaesthesia were determined, patients were intravenously administered different doses of the test drug, i.e. 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, or 6 mg, which were named the R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the loss of consciousness time. The secondary outcomes included the maintenance time and the number of assisted ventilators needed. The exceptional response of patients in terms of loss of consciousness maintenance time, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), SpO, and modified observers assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S) scores were recorded at baseline (T0), 3 min after the injection of the test drug (T1), 6 min after the injection of the test drug (T2), 9 min after the injection of the test drug (T3), 12 min after the injection of the test drug (T4), 15 min after the injection of the test drug (T5), 18 min after the injection of the test drug (T6), 21 min after the injection of the test drug (T7), and 24 min after the injection of the test drug (T8).

RESULTS

We included 80 patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 16 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in sex, age, and BMI amongst the 5 groups. The loss of consciousness time was significantly greater in the R2 group than in the R3, R4, and R5 groups (p < 0.001), and the loss of consciousness maintenance time was significantly greater in the R5 group than in the R3 group (p < 0.05). The MAP was significantly lower in the R2 and R5 groups than in the R1 group at T4 (p = 0.004) and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T5 (p = 0.007). The HR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R3 group at T3 (p = 0.004) and T4 (p = 0.007). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R4 group at T4 (p = 0.049) and significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T5 (p = 0.024) and T6 (p = 0.020). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1, R3 and R4 groups at T7 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R1 group than in the R2 and R5 groups at T8 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T8 (p = 0.001). SpO was significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.003) and significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 and R5 groups at T4 (p = 0.002), T5 (p = 0.001), T6 (p = 0.000), and T7 (p = 0.000). The MOAA/S scores were significantly lower in the R4 and R5 groups than in the R1 and R2 groups at T1 (p = 0.000), significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 and R3 groups at T2 (p = 0.004), and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that doses of 5-5.5 mg remimazolam are more suitable for sedation in elderly patients, and the loss of consciousness time and depth of sedation differed according to the remimazolam dosage. Doses of 5-5.5 mg remimazolam were associated with adequate levels of sedation in elderly patients and with a decreased risk of complications, whilst haemodynamic fluctuations occurred approximately 12-15 min after the administration of remimazolam.

摘要

背景

瑞马唑仑是一种苯二氮䓬类镇静剂,适用于全身麻醉诱导和维持。瑞马唑仑也用于门诊手术中的镇静;然而,大多数报告集中于非老年患者,而仅有少数研究报道了瑞马唑仑在老年患者接受区域神经阻滞麻醉时的应用。

目的

本研究旨在评估不同剂量瑞马唑仑在老年患者中与区域神经阻滞麻醉相关的效果。

方法

本研究于2022年2月至2023年3月在一家大学医院进行。我们纳入了80例年龄在65岁及以上接受区域神经阻滞麻醉的患者。在确定麻醉效果后,患者静脉注射不同剂量的受试药物,即4、4.5、5、5.5或6mg,分别命名为R1、R2、R3、R4和R5组。主要结局是意识消失时间。次要结局包括维持时间和所需辅助通气次数。在基线(T0)、注射受试药物后3分钟(T1)、6分钟(T2)、9分钟(T3)、12分钟(T4)、15分钟(T5)、18分钟(T6)、21分钟(T7)和24分钟(T8)记录患者在意识消失维持时间、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)以及改良的警觉/镇静状态观察评分(MOAA/S)方面的异常反应。

结果

根据纳入和排除标准,我们纳入了80例患者,每组16例。5组患者在性别、年龄和体重指数方面无显著差异。R2组的意识消失时间显著长于R3、R4和R5组(p<0.001),R5组的意识消失维持时间显著长于R3组(p<0.05)。在T4时,R2和R5组的MAP显著低于R1组(p=0.004),在T5时,R5组的MAP显著低于R1组(p=0.007)。在T3(p=0.004)和T4(p=0.007)时,R5组的HR显著低于R3组。在T4时,R5组的RR显著低于R4组(p=0.049),在T5(p=0.024)和T6(p=0.020)时,R4组的RR显著高于R2组。在T7时,R5组的RR显著低于R1、R3和R4组(p=0.001)。在T8时,R1组的RR显著高于R2和R5组(p=0.001)。在T8时,R4组的RR显著高于R2组(p=0.001)。在T3时,R3组的SpO显著低于R1组(p=0.003),在T4(p=0.002)、T5(p=0.001)、T6(p=0.000)和T7(p=0.000)时,R3组的SpO显著低于R1和R5组。在T1时,R4和R5组的MOAA/S评分显著低于R1和R2组(p=0.000),在T2时,R5组的MOAA/S评分显著低于R1和R3组(p=0.004),在T3时,R5组的MOAA/S评分显著低于R1组(p=0.036)。

结论

结果表明,5 - 5.5mg剂量的瑞马唑仑更适合老年患者的镇静,意识消失时间和镇静深度因瑞马唑仑剂量而异。5 - 5.5mg剂量的瑞马唑仑可使老年患者达到适当的镇静水平,并降低并发症风险,而血流动力学波动大约在瑞马唑仑给药后12 - 15分钟出现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f9/11656646/b28b00f03ddb/40001_2024_2204_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验