• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对中风临床医生的口腔保健教育干预措施的特点与效果:一项范围综述

The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Oral Healthcare Education Interventions for Stroke Clinicians: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

George Ajesh, Lombardo Lien, Ajwani Shilpi, Wynne Rochelle, Sanchez Paula, Kong Ariana, Talluri Bhavya, William Scott, Ferguson Caleb

机构信息

Australian Centre for Integration of Oral Health (ACIOH), School of Nursing & Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17795.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.17795
PMID:40296502
Abstract

AIMS

To explore the characteristics of oral healthcare education interventions for stroke clinicians and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving the oral health knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice among acute stroke clinicians.

DESIGN

Scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.

METHODS

Original full-text studies reporting educational oral healthcare interventions for stroke clinicians, including but not limited to nurses, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were extracted and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist aligned to the study methodology. Narrative synthesis was used to describe heterogeneous findings.

DATA SOURCES

Key electronic bibliographic databases including CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, Pubmed, and Scopus, in addition to grey literature, were searched for studies published between 1st January 2000 and 20th January 2024.

RESULTS

Five studies conducted in acute inpatient settings were included: two randomised controlled trials, two mixed-methods studies, and one quality improvement project. Most (n = 4) studies developed complex interventions that included education and other components (products, referral pathways, assessment tools), and were delivered either face-to-face or as an online program. Most studies reported positive changes in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. There was limited measurement of the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, with only one study reporting positive feedback from clinicians. There was no evidence to support changes in clinical practice following any of the included interventions.

CONCLUSION

Existing evidence indicates interventions for stroke clinicians have some potential for building stroke clinicians' capacity to provide adequate oral healthcare. There is however no evidence linking these interventions to optimised patient outcomes. There is a need for research focused on the implementation and dissemination of tailored oral health educational interventions incorporating clinically meaningful outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION/PATIENT CARE: Existing oral healthcare educational interventions appear to have a positive effect on stroke clinicians' oral health knowledge, confidence, and attitudes. Educational interventions in oral healthcare are perceived to be acceptable and feasible; however, further research is needed to design and test the effect of new interventions.

IMPACT

Integrated oral healthcare is particularly important for stroke survivors who are at greater risk of preventable aspiration pneumonia. This scoping review highlights the characteristics of existing educational programs for stroke clinicians, their effectiveness, and gaps in existing evidence. Review findings substantiate the need for future research to enhance existing oral healthcare interventions, to translate knowledge acquired from training into clinical practice, and to capture appropriate measures of effect.

REPORTING METHOD

The PRISMA-ScR Checklist.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

This review was registered with the Open Science Framework registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF).

摘要

目的

探讨针对中风临床医生的口腔保健教育干预措施的特点,以及这些干预措施在提高急性中风临床医生的口腔健康知识、态度、信心和实践方面的有效性。

设计

循证综述,以阿克西和奥马利(2005年)的框架为指导。

方法

报告针对中风临床医生(包括但不限于护士)的口腔保健教育干预措施的原始全文研究均符合纳入标准。使用与研究方法一致的乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)清单对纳入的研究进行提取和评估。采用叙述性综合法描述异质性研究结果。

数据来源

检索了关键电子文献数据库,包括CINAHL、Cochrane、MEDLINE(Ovid)、ProQuest、Pubmed和Scopus,此外还检索了灰色文献,以查找2000年1月1日至2024年1月20日期间发表的研究。

结果

纳入了五项在急性住院环境中进行的研究:两项随机对照试验、两项混合方法研究和一项质量改进项目。大多数(n = 4)研究开发了复杂的干预措施,包括教育和其他组成部分(产品、转诊途径、评估工具),并通过面对面或在线课程的方式提供。大多数研究报告了口腔健康知识、态度和信心方面的积极变化。对干预措施的可接受性和可行性的测量有限,只有一项研究报告了临床医生的积极反馈。没有证据支持任何纳入的干预措施后临床实践有变化。

结论

现有证据表明,针对中风临床医生的干预措施在培养中风临床医生提供充分口腔保健的能力方面有一定潜力。然而,没有证据表明这些干预措施与优化患者结局相关。需要开展侧重于实施和推广纳入具有临床意义结局的量身定制的口腔健康教育干预措施的研究。

对专业/患者护理的启示:现有的口腔保健教育干预措施似乎对中风临床医生的口腔健康知识、信心和态度有积极影响。口腔保健教育干预措施被认为是可接受和可行的;然而,需要进一步研究来设计和测试新干预措施的效果。

影响

综合口腔保健对中风幸存者尤为重要,他们发生可预防的吸入性肺炎的风险更高。本循证综述强调了现有针对中风临床医生教育项目的特点、其有效性以及现有证据中的差距。综述结果证实了未来研究的必要性,以加强现有的口腔保健干预措施,将从培训中获得的知识转化为临床实践,并获取适当的效果衡量指标。

报告方法

PRISMA-ScR清单。

方案注册

本综述已在开放科学框架注册中心(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF)注册。

相似文献

1
The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Oral Healthcare Education Interventions for Stroke Clinicians: A Scoping Review.针对中风临床医生的口腔保健教育干预措施的特点与效果:一项范围综述
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17795.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
5
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
8
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
9
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.
10
Patient education interventions for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病管理的患者教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD013854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013854.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral Hygiene in Patients with Stroke: A Best Practice Implementation Project Protocol.中风患者的口腔卫生:最佳实践实施项目方案
Nurs Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):148-156. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13010016.
2
Co-designing for behaviour change: The development of a theory-informed oral-care intervention for stroke survivors.共同设计行为改变方案:为中风幸存者开发一种基于理论的口腔护理干预措施。
Design Health (Abingdon). 2022 Jul 21;6(2):221-243. doi: 10.1080/24735132.2022.2096291. eCollection 2022.
3
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
Patient perceptions of oral health care following stroke: a qualitative study.脑卒中后患者对口腔保健的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01501-7.
5
Interventions for improving oral health in people after stroke.改善脑卒中后患者口腔健康的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 7;12(12):CD003864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003864.pub3.
6
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
7
Technology for maintaining oral care after stroke: considerations for patient-centered practice.脑卒中后口腔护理技术:以患者为中心实践的考虑因素。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):916-926. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1822450. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
9
Exploring nursing and allied health perspectives of quality oral care after stroke: A qualitative study.探讨脑卒中后优质口腔护理的护理和相关健康视角:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Aug;19(6):505-512. doi: 10.1177/1474515119886798. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
10
A pragmatic, multi-centered, stepped wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial pilot of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a complex Stroke Oral healthCare intervention pLan Evaluation II (SOCLE II) compared with usual oral healthcare in stroke wards.一项关于卒中口腔保健干预计划评估 II(SOCLE II)的临床和成本效益的实用、多中心、阶梯式楔形、集群随机对照试验飞行员研究,该研究比较了卒中病房中常规口腔保健与复杂的卒中口腔保健干预的效果。
Int J Stroke. 2020 Apr;15(3):318-323. doi: 10.1177/1747493019871824. Epub 2019 Sep 30.