Albdewi Michael, Zaki Mark M, Fearer Kelsey, Joshi Rushikesh S, Joseph Jacob R, Patel Rakesh D, Kashlan Osama
Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Mar 29;17(3):e81429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81429. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Introduction Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a surgical technique commonly used to treat degenerative disk disease in the lower lumbar spine. As the procedure commonly involves retraction of the iliac arteries and veins, potential complications include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and hemorrhagic vessel injuries. The goal of this retrospective review is to assess whether the use of intraoperative intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA), subcutaneous heparin (SCH), or neither is associated with clinical complications and surgical outcomes. Methods All patients undergoing ALIF from 2015 to 2023 at a tertiary academic medical center were reviewed. Intraoperative use of prothrombotic or anticoagulant and short- and long-term outcomes were assessed. Results One hundred seventy-nine patients were included; there were 81 (45.3%) female patients and an average age of 58.96 ± 13.34 years. Twenty-eight patients received SCH, 34 patients received TXA, and 117 received neither. The use of perioperative SCH or TXA in ALIF procedures did not result in statistically significant differences in complication rates or pain scores. Statistically significant differences were found with the use of coagulative intervention and blood transfusions, with the TXA requiring the fewest transfusions and the no-intervention group requiring the most. Patients receiving TXA were more likely to be discharged home without the need for any other services. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend of decreasing estimated blood loss (EBL) between the coagulation intervention groups, with no intervention having the highest EBL, followed by SCH and TXA. Conclusion The use of perioperative coagulative intervention in ALIF procedures did not result in a significant change in complication rates, hospital stays, or pain outcomes. The TXA group had a trend toward lower blood loss, no patients requiring a blood transfusion, a higher likelihood of being discharged home without any supplemental services, and the best neurologic outcomes. As such, further large and prospective trials should be performed to study the effect of TXA in ALIF patients further to determine whether patients undergoing ALIFs would benefit from TXA administration.
引言
腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)是一种常用于治疗下腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病的外科技术。由于该手术通常需要牵开髂动静脉,潜在并发症包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和血管出血性损伤。本回顾性研究的目的是评估术中静脉使用氨甲环酸(TXA)、皮下注射肝素(SCH)或两者均不使用是否与临床并发症及手术结果相关。
方法
回顾了2015年至2023年在一家三级学术医疗中心接受ALIF手术的所有患者。评估术中促凝血或抗凝药物的使用情况以及短期和长期结果。
结果
共纳入179例患者;其中女性患者81例(45.3%),平均年龄58.96±13.34岁。28例患者接受了SCH,34例患者接受了TXA,117例患者两者均未接受。在ALIF手术中使用围手术期SCH或TXA在并发症发生率或疼痛评分方面未产生统计学显著差异。在使用凝血干预和输血方面发现了统计学显著差异,TXA组输血最少,无干预组输血最多。接受TXA的患者更有可能无需任何其他服务即可出院回家。尽管无统计学显著差异,但凝血干预组之间估计失血量(EBL)有下降趋势,无干预组EBL最高,其次是SCH组和TXA组。
结论
在ALIF手术中使用围手术期凝血干预在并发症发生率、住院时间或疼痛结果方面未产生显著变化。TXA组有失血较少的趋势,无患者需要输血,无需任何补充服务即可出院回家的可能性更高,且神经学结果最佳。因此,应进行进一步的大型前瞻性试验,以进一步研究TXA对ALIF患者的影响,确定接受ALIF手术的患者是否会从TXA给药中获益。