Mungalpara Nirav, Lee Cody, Kim Sunjung, Chen Kevin, Baker Hayden, Athiviraham Aravind, Bassem Elhassan, Koh Jason, Maassen Nicholas, Amirouche Farid
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov 19;7(2):101045. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101045. eCollection 2025 Apr.
To compare the biomechanical effectiveness of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) to restore the native shoulder kinematics in managing massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) using a dynamic shoulder testing system in a cadaver model.
Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hemithoraces were tested using a custom-made dynamic shoulder testing system. The conditions tested are intact, supraspinatus tear, MRCT (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear), LTT with Achilles allograft, SCR combined with LTT, and SCR alone. Measurements included cumulative deltoid force, humeral head translation (HHT), and subacromial peak pressure during humeral abduction at various angles.
Significant reductions in cumulative deltoid force were observed from intact to MRCT conditions ( = .023). LTT alone significantly improved deltoid force compared to its combination with SCR ( = .017) and outperformed SCR alone ( = .023). The intact condition showed increasing subacromial peak pressure with higher abduction angles, peaking at 541 kPa at 90°. MRCT exhibited the highest HHT and peak pressure, indicating significant instability. LTT reduced HHT and peak pressure compared to MRCT, indicating partial restoration of stability. The combined LTT + SCR condition demonstrated HHT values close to the intact condition and lower peak pressures, indicating substantial restoration of glenohumeral stability.
Simulated active unconstrained humeral abduction in the scapular plane using an entire hemithorax model suggests that LTT can restore dynamic stability and deltoid function in MRCTs, while SCR offers static stability without restoring deltoid function. Combining LTT and SCR may result in lower subacromial peak pressures on the undersurface of the acromion than either procedure alone.
This study will contribute to understanding shoulder kinetics concerning current surgical techniques and suggest a dynamic concept of shoulder biomechanics testing.
使用尸体模型中的动态肩部测试系统,比较上盂唇重建(SCR)和下斜方肌腱转移(LTT)在治疗巨大肩袖撕裂(MRCT)时恢复天然肩部运动学的生物力学效果。
使用定制的动态肩部测试系统对八个新鲜冷冻的尸体半胸进行测试。测试的条件包括完整、冈上肌撕裂、MRCT(冈上肌和冈下肌撕裂)、同种异体跟腱LTT、SCR联合LTT以及单独的SCR。测量包括在不同角度进行肱骨外展时三角肌累积力量、肱骨头平移(HHT)和肩峰下峰值压力。
从完整状态到MRCT状态,观察到三角肌累积力量显著降低(P = 0.023)。与联合SCR相比,单独的LTT显著改善了三角肌力量(P = 0.017),且优于单独的SCR(P = 0.023)。完整状态下,肩峰下峰值压力随着外展角度增加而升高,在90°时达到541 kPa的峰值。MRCT表现出最高的HHT和峰值压力,表明存在明显的不稳定。与MRCT相比,LTT降低了HHT和峰值压力,表明稳定性部分恢复。联合LTT + SCR状态下的HHT值接近完整状态,且峰值压力更低,表明盂肱关节稳定性得到显著恢复。
使用整个半胸模型模拟肩胛平面内主动无约束的肱骨外展表明,LTT可恢复MRCT中的动态稳定性和三角肌功能,而SCR可提供静态稳定性但不能恢复三角肌功能。联合LTT和SCR可能比单独任何一种手术在肩峰下表面产生更低的峰值压力。
本研究将有助于理解当前手术技术相关的肩部动力学,并提出肩部生物力学测试的动态概念。