文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Comparison of immunotherapy based total neoadjuvant therapy or standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhao Wen, Gao Wenxing, Du Jitao, Li Dingchang, Liu Xianqiang, Chang Zhengyao, Chen Peng, Sun Xu, Zhao Yingjie, Jiao Hanqing, Wan Xiangbin, Dong Guanglong

机构信息

School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 14;16:1513716. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1513716. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1513716
PMID:40297574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034688/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy produces a synergistic effect in patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair-proficient (MSS/pMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and safety of immunotherapy combined with long-course chemoradiotherapy (ICIs + nCRT) versus immunotherapy combined with total neoadjuvant therapy (ICIs + TNT). METHODS: This retrospective study collected clinical data of adult patients with clinical T3-4 and/or N1 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent ICIs + TNT or ICIs + nCRT followed by curative surgery at four medical centers between March 2020 and August 2021. The study compared clinical efficacy, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) at 3 years postoperatively, and adverse event. RESULTS: Among 211 enrolled patients, 89 (42%) received ICIs + TNT, while 122 (58%) underwent ICIs + nCRT, with a median age of 56.0 years (range, 20.0-75.0 years). The ICIs + TNT group had a higher median number of resected lymph nodes (15.0 [range, 4.0-37.0] vs. 13.0 [range, 3.0-33.0], =0.028) compared to the ICIs+nCRT group. However, the groups had no substantial difference in median operative time. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 49.4% (44/89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.8%-61.3%) in the ICIs + TNT group compared to 35.3% (43/122, 95% CI 26.8%-44.4%) in the ICIs + nCRT group, respectively, with significant difference (=0.039). After adjusting for potential confounders, the 3-year DFS rates were comparable between the two groups (84.3% vs. 81.9%; =0.620), as were the OS rates (94.0% vs. 91.1%; =0.634). Factors independently associated with poorer DFS included age ≤50 years (=0.044) and a neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score ≥8 (=0.008). Similarly, patients aged ≤50 years (=0.025) exhibited a trend toward worse OS than those older than 50 years. The safety profiles of the two treatment groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ICIs + TNT demonstrated therapeutic efficacy and a safety profile comparable to ICIs + nCRT in patients with LARC and MSS/pMMR status. Although ICIs + TNT achieved numerically higher downstaging rates, it was not associated with improved survival outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of refining patient selection criteria and making judicious treatment decisions to enhance the prognosis of individuals with rectal cancer.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/ef18d1014314/fimmu-16-1513716-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/e06fa43912cf/fimmu-16-1513716-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/2d66fa030e7e/fimmu-16-1513716-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/f1569af86ddc/fimmu-16-1513716-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/a6a6e072fb36/fimmu-16-1513716-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/ef18d1014314/fimmu-16-1513716-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/e06fa43912cf/fimmu-16-1513716-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/2d66fa030e7e/fimmu-16-1513716-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/f1569af86ddc/fimmu-16-1513716-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/a6a6e072fb36/fimmu-16-1513716-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e668/12034688/ef18d1014314/fimmu-16-1513716-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of immunotherapy based total neoadjuvant therapy or standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Front Immunol. 2025-4-14

[2]
[Comparison of short-term efficacy and perioperative safety between neoadjuvant therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-3-25

[3]
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Comparison of Short- and Long-term Oncologic Outcomes.

Ann Surg. 2022-12-1

[4]
[Application of short-course radiotherapy with total neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of middle and low rectal cancer].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023-1-31

[5]
[Rectum-preserving surgery after consolidation neoadjuvant therapy or totally neoadjuvant therapy for low rectal cancer: a preliminary report].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-3-25

[6]
Clinical outcomes of elderly patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Ann Oncol. 2015-7-30

[7]
Pathologic Complete Response, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Survival Paradox in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024-10

[8]
Tolerability, Safety, and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Capecitabine for Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018-3-8

[9]
Intensified Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Intensified Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Anticancer Res. 2022-2

[10]
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With Short-Course Radiation: US Experience of a Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer Therapy.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2022-2-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for DNA mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable non-metastatic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Immunol. 2025-1-27

[2]
Nutritional and inflammatory status dynamics reflect preoperative treatment response and predict prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional analysis.

Surgery. 2025-2

[3]
Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1 antibody sintilimab in pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial.

Cancer Cell. 2024-9-9

[4]
Efficacy and safety of combining short-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with envafolimab in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with microsatellite stability: a phase II PRECAM experimental study.

Int J Surg. 2025-1-1

[5]
Randomized Phase II Trial of Immunotherapy-Based Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Proficient Mismatch Repair or Microsatellite Stable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TORCH).

J Clin Oncol. 2024-10

[6]
PD-1 blockade plus COX inhibitors in dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer: Clinical, genomic, and immunologic analyses from the PCOX trial.

Med. 2024-8-9

[7]
Long-Term Outcomes of dMMR/MSI-H Rectal Cancer Treated With Anti-PD-1-Based Immunotherapy as Curative-Intent Treatment.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024-3-18

[8]
Efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade plus long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (NECTAR): a multi-center phase 2 study.

Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-3-11

[9]
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy With PD-1 Blockade for High-Risk Proficient Mismatch Repair Rectal Cancer.

JAMA Surg. 2024-5-1

[10]
Radiotherapy remodels the tumor microenvironment for enhancing immunotherapeutic sensitivity.

Cell Death Dis. 2023-10-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索