Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉内注入乙醇治疗顽固性室性心律失常。

Coronary venous ethanol infusion for treatment of refractory ventricular arrhythmias.

作者信息

Zghaib Tarek, Enriquez Andres, Schaller Robert D, Dixit Sanjay, Supple Gregory E, Garcia Fermin C, Callans David J, Hyman Matthew C, Frankel David S, Marchlinski Francis E, Nazarian Saman, Markman Timothy M

机构信息

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2025 Sep;22(9):e682-e690. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.049. Epub 2025 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary venous ethanol infusion or coronary venous ethanol ablation (CVEA) has been used to treat ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) refractory to radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

OBJECTIVE

This single-center study aimed to describe acute- and subacute-term safety and efficacy of CVEA for the management of refractory VAs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CVEA for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) at our center were included. Coronary venous anatomy was delineated, and VAs were mapped in epicardial or septal veins in addition to traditional mapping techniques. Ethanol was infused in the target vessel based on anatomy, size of target veins, and collateral flow.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (aged 61.4 ± 12.5 years; 90% men, 80% white) underwent 32 ablation procedures with CVEA for refractor-y VT (n = 20) or PVCs (n = 12). There were 28 patients (93%) who had undergone RFA previously and 28 who had failed anti-arrhythmic drugs. In the VT ablation cohort, acute suppression of clinical VT was achieved after CVEA in 15 cases (75%); 1 (5%) required additional RFA, 1 was non-inducible at baseline, and 3 (15%) remained inducible for clinical VT. During follow-up, targeted VT recurred in 3 (15%) and new VTs occurred in 7 cases (35%). In the PVC ablation cohort, acute suppression was achieved in 11 patients (92%). During follow-up, PVC suppression was sustained in these 11 patients with reduction in PVC burden from 24.8% ± 13.9% to 2.1% ± 2.1%. Complications potentially related to CVEA included complete heart block (2), transient left bundle branch block (1), pericardial effusion (1), and cardiogenic shock (2).

CONCLUSION

CVEA can be effective for management of complex VAs refractory to standard RFA with an acceptable safety profile.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉内乙醇注入或冠状动脉内乙醇消融(CVEA)已被用于治疗对射频消融(RFA)难治的室性心律失常(VA)。

目的

本单中心研究旨在描述CVEA治疗难治性VA的急性和亚急性期安全性及有效性。

方法

纳入在我们中心接受CVEA治疗难治性室性心动过速(VT)或室性早搏(PVC)的患者。除传统标测技术外,还描绘了冠状静脉解剖结构,并在室壁静脉或间隔静脉中对VA进行标测。根据解剖结构、目标静脉大小和侧支血流情况,将乙醇注入目标血管。

结果

共有30例患者(年龄61.4±12.5岁;90%为男性,80%为白人)接受了32次CVEA消融手术,用于治疗难治性VT(n = 20)或PVC(n = 12)。28例患者(93%)曾接受过RFA,28例对抗心律失常药物治疗无效。在VT消融队列中,15例(75%)患者在CVEA后实现了临床VT的急性抑制;1例(5%)需要额外的RFA,1例在基线时不能诱发VT,3例(15%)仍可诱发临床VT。随访期间,3例(15%)患者出现目标VT复发,7例(35%)出现新的VT。在PVC消融队列中,11例患者(92%)实现了急性抑制。随访期间,这11例患者的PVC抑制得以持续,PVC负荷从24.8%±13.9%降至2.1%±2.1%。可能与CVEA相关的并发症包括完全性心脏传导阻滞(2例)、短暂性左束支传导阻滞(1例)、心包积液(1例)和心源性休克(2例)。

结论

CVEA可有效治疗对标准RFA难治的复杂性VA,且安全性可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验