Younis Arwa, Mdaihly Mohamad, Hight Nolan, Hussein Ayman A, Demian Joe, Callahan Thomas, Martin David O, Nakhla Shady, Kanj Mohamed, Higuchi Koji, Sroubek Jakub, Liuba Ioan, Kochar Arshneel, Lee Justin, Saliba Walid I, Taigen Tyler, Baranowski Bryan, Chung Mina, Wazni Oussama M, Santangeli Pasquale
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.06.006.
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) with a pentaspline catheter has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Evidence of its application for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias remains limited.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pentaspline PFA for ventricular arrhythmias.
We included consecutive patients undergoing PFA with a pentaspline catheter for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) between May and October 2024. PFA was used for large-footprint VT substrate ablation in patients with large scars or as a bailout approach after acute radiofrequency failure.
A total of 11 patients (mean age, 70 ± 7 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, 35% ± 12%) were included. In 9 patients, PFA was used for VT (7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 2 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy), and in 2 patients for papillary muscle PVCs (1 who underwent concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation). In 4 patients, PFA was performed after acute radiofrequency ablation (RFA) failure and was successful in suppressing the targeted VT/PVC in all cases. In 7 patients, PFA was performed for large VT substrate modification or PVC: in 2 patients, only PFA was used, whereas in the remaining 5 patients, touch-up RFA was used to complete substrate modification. Noninducibility of VT/PVC was achieved in all cases. During a mean follow-up of 6 months, VT recurred in 2 patients and PVC in 1. No procedural-related complications occurred.
In this first US series, VT/PVC ablation using a pentaspline PFA catheter for large VT substrate modification or after acute RFA failure appeared effective and safe, with promising acute and mid-term follow-up results.
五叶形导管脉冲场消融(PFA)最近已获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于心房颤动的导管消融。其用于室性心律失常消融的证据仍然有限。
本研究旨在评估五叶形PFA治疗室性心律失常的安全性和有效性。
我们纳入了2024年5月至10月期间连续接受五叶形导管PFA治疗室性心动过速(VT)或室性早搏(PVC)的患者。PFA用于有大瘢痕患者的大面积VT基质消融,或作为急性射频消融失败后的补救方法。
共纳入11例患者(平均年龄70±7岁;左心室射血分数35%±12%)。9例患者使用PFA治疗VT(7例为缺血性心肌病,2例为非缺血性心肌病),2例患者使用PFA治疗乳头肌PVC(1例同时接受心房颤动消融)。4例患者在急性射频消融(RFA)失败后进行PFA,所有病例均成功抑制了目标VT/PVC。7例患者进行PFA用于大面积VT基质改良或PVC:2例患者仅使用PFA,其余5例患者使用补充RFA完成基质改良。所有病例均实现了VT/PVC不能诱发。在平均6个月的随访期间,2例患者VT复发,1例患者PVC复发。未发生与手术相关的并发症。
在这个美国首个系列研究中,使用五叶形PFA导管进行VT/PVC消融用于大面积VT基质改良或急性RFA失败后似乎有效且安全,急性和中期随访结果良好。