Patriti Alberto, Ricci Marcella Lodovica, Eugeni Emilio, Stortoni Pier Paolo, Serio Maria Elena, Scarcelli Antonella, Pigazzi Alessio, Montalti Roberto
Department of Surgery, Division of General and Oncologic Surgery, AST Pesaro-Urbino, Ospedale San Salvatore, Piazzale Cinelli,1, 61121, Pesaro, Italy.
Division of Gastroenterology, AST Pesaro-Urbino, Ospedale Santa Croce, Fano, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02218-w.
This study aimed to identify patient-specific risk factors and intraoperative findings obtained from indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) and intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC), using a structured endoscopic grading scale, to guide surgical decisions and minimize the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. One hundred-eleven patients undergoing elective left-sided colorectal resections were evaluated intraoperatively using both ICG-FA and IOC, with anastomoses classified by a new endoscopic grading scale (Grades 1-5). Anastomoses classified as suboptimal (grade > 3) were taken down and reconstructed or repaired. The primary aim of the study was to determine the rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) using this integrated strategy and subsequently to identify patient-specific risk factors associated with AL. Among 111 patients, 102 patients (91.8%) at the IOC were classified as Grade 1, 4 patients (3.6%) as Grade 2, 4 patients (3.6%) as Grade 3, and 1 patient (0.9%) as Grade 4. The overall AL rate was 10.8% (12 patients). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only anastomotic level ≤ 12 cm emerged as an independent risk factor of AL (OR 0.064, 95% CI 0.008-0.517, p = 0.010). Among patients who developed an AL, 3 (25%) required surgical intervention, the others were managed endoscopically or conservatively. An integrated approach involving ICG-FA and IOC may aid to construct a technically optimal colorectal anastomosis. Nevertheless, anastomotic leakage can still occur due to factors unrelated to intraoperative technique, particularly low anastomosis height. These factors should prompt routine consideration of protective loop ileostomy and pelvic drainage to mitigate AL clinical consequences.
本研究旨在利用结构化内镜分级量表,确定从吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影(ICG-FA)和术中结肠镜检查(IOC)获得的患者特异性风险因素及术中发现,以指导手术决策并降低结直肠手术中吻合口漏的风险。对111例行择期左侧结直肠切除术的患者术中同时使用ICG-FA和IOC进行评估,吻合口采用新的内镜分级量表(1-5级)进行分类。分类为次优(分级>3级)的吻合口被拆除并重建或修复。该研究的主要目的是使用这种综合策略确定吻合口漏(AL)的发生率,并随后确定与AL相关的患者特异性风险因素。在111例患者中,IOC检查时102例患者(91.8%)被分类为1级,4例患者(3.6%)为2级,4例患者(3.6%)为3级,1例患者(0.9%)为4级。总体AL发生率为10.8%(12例患者)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,仅吻合口水平≤12 cm是AL的独立危险因素(OR 0.064,95%CI 0.008-0.517,p = 0.010)。在发生AL的患者中,3例(25%)需要手术干预,其他患者采用内镜或保守治疗。涉及ICG-FA和IOC的综合方法可能有助于构建技术上最佳的结直肠吻合口。然而,由于与术中技术无关的因素,尤其是吻合口位置低,吻合口漏仍可能发生。这些因素应促使常规考虑行保护性回肠造口术和盆腔引流,以减轻AL的临床后果。