特发性肺纤维化合并可手术切除肺癌患者的临床分析:一项从间质性肺疾病医生角度进行的回顾性队列研究
Clinical analysis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis concurrent with surgery resectable lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study from perspective of ILD physicians.
作者信息
Chen Qi, Shi Yujie, Chen Ruxuan, Xu Kai, Huang Cheng, Li Ji, Li Zhiyi, Wang Mengqi, Shao Chi, Huang Hui, Wang Mengzhao
机构信息
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuaifuyuan Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Radiological Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, #1 Shuaifuyuan Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
出版信息
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03680-3.
BACKGROUND
Surgery resection would improve idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients with early-stage lung cancer (LC). However, most associated studies were published from surgeons. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) physicians involved in perioperative management would be helpful for improving patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis combined with lung cancer (IPF-LC). To enhance the understanding of the clinical characteristics presented by patients with IPF-LC who have undergone surgical resection, and to explore the factors linked to unfavorable prognosis, our ILD physicians conducted this study.
METHODS
We retrospectively examined clinical records of IPF-LC patients at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2014 to December 2023.Data related to clinical manifestations and treatment methods were collected. Patients underwent routine follow-up through clinical assessments and telephone consultations. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory features of 12 surviving patients and 8 deceased patients were comparatively analysed.
RESULTS
There were 30 males and 2 females, aged from 49 years to 82 years. Twenty-eight patients had a history of smoking. Twenty-five patients had at least one comorbidity and emphysema was the most common. IPF was diagnosed before LC in 8 patients but none of them were prescribed with anti-fibrotic medications. Twenty-four patients were simultaneously diagnosed with LC and IPF, and 7 of them were prescribed anti-fibrotic medications. After surgery, 27 patients were pathologically diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and 26 patients were classified as stage I or II lung cancer. During follow-up, 8 patients died, 12 patients lost follow-up and 12 patients survived. Among the 8 deceased patients, 5 patients died from acute exacerbation of IPF, one died from cancer progression and 2 died from surgical complications. The serum Cyfra211 level was higher and the lung cancer stage was more advanced in the non-survival group than in the survival group.
CONCLUSION
Most of our IPF-LC patients were elderly males with a history of smoking and had at least one comorbidity. Most of them were diagnosed with IPF and LC simultaneously. However, only one fifth were prescribed with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Acute exacerbation of IPF was the main cause of death. Similar to the LC patients, higher serum Cyfra211 levels and more advanced lung cancer stages were associated with a poor prognosis for our enrolled IPF-LC patients.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER
Not applicable.
背景
手术切除可改善早期肺癌(LC)合并特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的患者。然而,大多数相关研究由外科医生发表。参与围手术期管理的间质性肺疾病(ILD)医生有助于改善特发性肺纤维化合并肺癌(IPF-LC)患者的病情。为了加深对接受手术切除的IPF-LC患者临床特征的理解,并探索与不良预后相关的因素,我们ILD科医生开展了本研究。
方法
我们回顾性研究了2014年1月至2023年12月在北京协和医院就诊的IPF-LC患者的临床记录。收集了临床表现和治疗方法相关的数据。患者通过临床评估和电话咨询进行常规随访。对12例存活患者和8例死亡患者的人口统计学、临床和实验室特征进行了比较分析。
结果
共30例男性和2例女性,年龄49岁至82岁。28例患者有吸烟史。25例患者至少有一种合并症,其中肺气肿最为常见。8例患者在肺癌之前被诊断为IPF,但均未接受抗纤维化药物治疗。24例患者同时被诊断为LC和IPF,其中7例接受了抗纤维化药物治疗。术后,27例患者经病理诊断为非小细胞肺癌,26例患者被归类为I期或II期肺癌。随访期间,8例患者死亡,12例患者失访,12例患者存活。在8例死亡患者中,5例死于IPF急性加重,1例死于癌症进展,2例死于手术并发症。非存活组的血清细胞角蛋白片段211(Cyfra211)水平高于存活组,且肺癌分期更晚。
结论
我们的大多数IPF-LC患者为老年男性,有吸烟史,且至少有一种合并症。大多数患者同时被诊断为IPF和LC。然而,只有五分之一的患者接受了吡非尼酮或尼达尼布治疗。IPF急性加重是主要死因。与LC患者相似,血清Cyfra211水平升高和肺癌分期更晚与我们纳入的IPF-LC患者预后不良相关。
临床试验编号
不适用。