Xia Yu, Liang Anfeng, Wang Mei, Zhang Jianlin
Department of Burn and Trauma Medicine, First Naval Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Zhanjiang, China.
Trauma Center, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 29;30(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02621-4.
The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a recognized marker of vascular endothelial health but has limited application in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to explore the association between EASIX and prognosis in critically ill patients with AF.
The patient's data were extracted from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV(MIMIC-IV) database. EASIX was calculated as lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) × creatinine (mg/dL)/platelets (10 cells/L) and log2-transformed for statistical analysis. The Boruta algorithm and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) Regression were used for feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to assess EASIX as a risk factor, with nonlinear relationships evaluated using restricted cubic spline curves. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was utilized to compare the predictive performance of EASIX with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on EASIX quartiles (with Q1 as the reference) and stratified analyses were conducted to further explore these associations.
A total of 4896 patients with complete data were included. In-hospital, 28-day, and 365-day all-cause mortality rates were26.04%, 29.25%, and 49.75%, respectively. The median EASIX was 5.64 (4.56, 6.84). Higher EASIX was significantly associated with increased in-hospital, short-term, and long-term all-cause mortality after multivariable adjustment. Patients in quartiles Q2, Q3, and Q4 had significantly higher mortality than those in Q1, showing a clear trend. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that patients with higher EASIX scores had significantly lower survival. The AUC showed that the performance of EASIX in predicting both short-term and long-term all-cause mortality was comparable to the SOFA and higher than the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Stratified analyses indicated that the association remained robust across subgroups, accounting for various underlying conditions and hospital interventions.
EASIX is a reliable predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with AF. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm its broader applicability in other populations.
内皮激活与应激指数(EASIX)是血管内皮健康的公认标志物,但在心房颤动(AF)患者中的应用有限。本研究旨在探讨EASIX与危重症AF患者预后之间的关联。
从重症监护医学信息数据库IV(MIMIC-IV)中提取患者数据。EASIX计算公式为乳酸脱氢酶(U/L)×肌酐(mg/dL)/血小板(10⁹细胞/L),并进行log₂转换用于统计分析。采用Boruta算法和最小绝对收缩与选择算子(Lasso)回归进行特征选择。使用多变量逻辑回归和Cox比例风险模型评估EASIX作为危险因素,使用受限立方样条曲线评估非线性关系。利用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较EASIX与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分及CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分的预测性能。此外,基于EASIX四分位数(以Q1为参照)进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析和分层分析,以进一步探讨这些关联。
共纳入4896例数据完整的患者。住院、28天和365天的全因死亡率分别为26.04%、29.25%和49.75%。EASIX中位数为5.64(4.56,6.84)。多变量调整后,较高的EASIX与住院、短期和长期全因死亡率增加显著相关。四分位数Q2、Q3和Q4的患者死亡率显著高于Q1的患者,呈现明显趋势。Kaplan-Meier分析证实,EASIX评分较高的患者生存率显著较低。AUC显示,EASIX在预测短期和长期全因死亡率方面的性能与SOFA相当,且高于CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分。分层分析表明,在各亚组中这种关联均保持稳健,涵盖了各种基础疾病和医院干预措施。
EASIX是危重症AF患者短期和长期死亡率的可靠预测指标。未来需要进行前瞻性研究以证实其在其他人群中的更广泛适用性。