• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的技术使用与健康行为:技术采用的潜在动机重要吗?

Technology use and health behavior among patients with diabetes: do underlying motives for technology adoption matter?

作者信息

Csuka Sára Imola, Horvát Barbara, Csordás Georgina, Lakatos Csilla, Martos Tamás

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Schools of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 15;7:1455261. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1455261. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1455261
PMID:40302933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12037620/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A growing number of health technology solutions are designed for people with diabetes to ease disease self-management. However, according to some studies, technology can also bring dissatisfaction. According to the Motivation, Engagement, and Thriving in User Experience model, the use of technology is only beneficial if it is linked to the experience of autonomy. The study aimed to investigate the associations between health technology use and technology adoption motivation and associated health behavior of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted on a sample of 315 patients with diabetes. The Technology Adoption Propensity Questionnaire was applied to assess general attitudes toward technology, the Autonomy and Competence in Technology Adoption Questionnaire for underlying motives of technology use, and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities tool for health behavior.

RESULTS

The results showed that technology use was predicted by proficiency (but not optimism) and lower levels of vulnerability and dependence. In addition, technology use predicted health behavior (diet and physical exercise) frequency. After refining the results further, among technology users, only autonomous motivation of technology use predicted health behavior, while controlled motivation had a slightly negative predictive effect on following the diet.

DISCUSSION

Particular attention should be paid to person-based health-related technology interventions for enhancing proficiency and reducing feelings of vulnerability and dependence on technologies. Ultimately, it is not the adoption of a technology , but the autonomous motivation for adoption that is associated with more favorable health behavior.

摘要

引言

越来越多的健康技术解决方案是为糖尿病患者设计的,以方便他们进行疾病自我管理。然而,根据一些研究,技术也可能带来不满。根据用户体验中的动机、参与度和茁壮成长模型,只有当技术使用与自主体验相关联时才有益。本研究旨在调查1型和2型糖尿病患者的健康技术使用与技术采用动机以及相关健康行为之间的关联。

方法

对315名糖尿病患者进行了横断面问卷调查。应用技术采用倾向问卷评估对技术的总体态度,应用技术采用中的自主性和能力问卷评估技术使用的潜在动机,应用糖尿病自我护理活动总结工具评估健康行为。

结果

结果表明,技术使用可由熟练程度(而非乐观态度)以及较低水平的脆弱性和依赖性预测。此外,技术使用可预测健康行为(饮食和体育锻炼)的频率。进一步细化结果后发现,在技术使用者中,只有技术使用的自主动机可预测健康行为,而受控动机对饮食依从性有轻微的负面预测作用。

讨论

应特别关注基于个人的健康相关技术干预措施,以提高熟练程度并减少对技术的脆弱感和依赖感。最终,与更有利的健康行为相关的不是技术的采用,而是采用技术的自主动机。

相似文献

1
Technology use and health behavior among patients with diabetes: do underlying motives for technology adoption matter?糖尿病患者的技术使用与健康行为:技术采用的潜在动机重要吗?
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 15;7:1455261. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1455261. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationships between health literacy, motivation and diet and physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes participating in peer-led support groups.参与同伴主导支持小组的2型糖尿病患者的健康素养、动机与饮食及身体活动之间的关系。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Aug;12(4):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
Testing a Self-Determination Theory Model of Healthy Eating in a South African Township.在南非一个城镇对健康饮食的自我决定理论模型进行测试。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 25;11:2181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02181. eCollection 2020.
4
Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review.运动、身体活动与自我决定理论:系统综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
5
User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies.用户画像和角色在消费者健康技术的设计和开发中的应用。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Nov;82(11):e251-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
6
Determinants of glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: testing a process model based on self-determination theory.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的决定因素:基于自我决定理论检验一个过程模型。
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 7;6(10):e04993. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04993. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
What Motivates People With (Pre)Diabetes to Move? Testing Self-Determination Theory in Rural Uganda.是什么促使(前期)糖尿病患者运动?在乌干达农村地区对自我决定理论进行检验。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 24;11:404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00404. eCollection 2020.
8
Testing the METUX Model in Higher Education: Interface and Task Need-Satisfaction Predict Engagement, Learning, and Well-Being.在高等教育中测试METUX模型:界面与任务需求满足度预测参与度、学习效果和幸福感。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:631564. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631564. eCollection 2021.
9
Is autonomous motivation the key to maintaining an active lifestyle in first-episode psychosis?自主动机是维持首发精神病患者积极生活方式的关键吗?
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):821-827. doi: 10.1111/eip.12373. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
10
Success in Weight Management Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Do Perceived Autonomy Support, Autonomous Motivation, and Self-Care Competence Play a Role?2型糖尿病患者体重管理的成功:感知到的自主支持、自主动机和自我护理能力是否发挥作用?
Behav Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;44(2):151-159. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2017.1292997. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Technology Access and Health-Related Internet Use Among People Experiencing Homelessness in Hungary: Quantitative Survey.匈牙利流浪人群的数字技术获取和与健康相关的互联网使用情况:定量调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 19;24(10):e38729. doi: 10.2196/38729.
2
Health care effects and medical benefits of a smartphone-based diabetes self-management application: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于智能手机的糖尿病自我管理应用的健康保健效果和医疗获益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 11;23(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06248-2.
3
Obesity and Chronic Kidney Disease in US Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.美国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人的肥胖与慢性肾脏病。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):1247-1256. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab927.
4
Striving for autonomy in everyday diabetes self-management-qualitative exploration via grounded theory approach.努力实现日常糖尿病自我管理中的自主性——基于扎根理论方法的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 24;11(12):e058885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058885.
5
Type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults: clinical considerations and management.老年人 2 型糖尿病:临床注意事项与管理。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021 Sep;17(9):534-548. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00512-2. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Success in increasing physical activity (PA) among patients with type 2 diabetes: a self-determination theory perspective.2型糖尿病患者增加身体活动(PA)的成功经验:自我决定理论视角
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Apr 25;6(1):104-119. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1462707.
7
Satisfied or Frustrated? A Qualitative Analysis of Need Satisfying and Need Frustrating Experiences of Engaging With Digital Health Technology in Chronic Care.满意还是沮丧?对慢性病护理中使用数字健康技术的需求满足与需求受挫经历的定性分析
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;8:623773. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.623773. eCollection 2020.
8
An examination of the socio-demographic correlates of patient adherence to self-management behaviors and the mediating roles of health attitudes and self-efficacy among patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and hypertension.考察社会人口统计学因素与患者同时患有 2 型糖尿病和高血压时自我管理行为依从性的相关性,以及健康态度和自我效能在其中的中介作用。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):1227. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09274-4.
9
User Retention and Engagement With a Mobile App Intervention to Support Self-Management in Australians With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes (My Care Hub): Mixed Methods Study.用户对一款移动应用干预措施的保留和参与度,以支持澳大利亚 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理(我的护理中心):混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 11;8(6):e17802. doi: 10.2196/17802.
10
The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review.数字健康伦理:主题述评。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2313-2343. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13.