Rebuttal From Dr Kim et al.
作者信息
Kim Roger Y, Sears Catherine R, Pastis Nicholas J
机构信息
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care (R. Y. K.), Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Occupational Medicine (C. R. S.), Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; the Division of Pulmonary Medicine (C. R. S.), Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; and the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine (N. J. P.), Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
出版信息
CHEST Pulm. 2024 Sep;2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100069. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Rebuttal From Dr Kim et al.金博士等人的反驳
CHEST Pulm. 2024 Sep;2(3). doi: 10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100069. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Rebuttal From Dr Tolbert et al.托尔伯特博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2023 Jan;163(1):34-35. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.036.
3
Rebuttal From Dr Thursfield et al.瑟斯菲尔德博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):25. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.073.
4
Rebuttal From Dr Tomassetti et al.托马塞蒂博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2021 Dec;160(6):2015-2016. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.059.
5
Rebuttal From Dr Tritschler et al.特里奇勒博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1451-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.039. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Rebuttal From Dr David Jimenez et al.大卫·希门尼斯博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Jun;161(6):1453-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.01.038. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
7
Rebuttal From Dr White et al.怀特博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Jul;162(1):44-45. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.032.
8
Rebuttal From Dr DeCamp et al.德坎普博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Aug;162(2):292-293. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.014.
9
Rebuttal From Dr James et al.詹姆斯博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2022 Aug;162(2):293-294. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.013.
10
Rebuttal From Dr Edwards et al.来自爱德华兹博士等人的反驳
Chest. 2023 Jan;163(1):32-33. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.035.
本文引用的文献
1
Diagnostic Excellence Through the Lens of Patient-Centeredness.以患者为中心视角下的卓越诊断。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2127-2128. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.19513.
2
Association of the Intensity of Diagnostic Evaluation With Outcomes in Incidentally Detected Lung Nodules.偶然发现的肺部结节的诊断评估强度与结果的相关性研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):480-489. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8250.
3
Assessment of Plasma Proteomics Biomarker's Ability to Distinguish Benign From Malignant Lung Nodules: Results of the PANOPTIC (Pulmonary Nodule Plasma Proteomic Classifier) Trial.评估血浆蛋白质组生物标志物鉴别良恶性肺结节的能力：PANOPTIC（肺结节血浆蛋白质组分类器）试验的结果。
Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Communication About the Probability of Cancer in Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.关于不确定肺部结节癌症可能性的沟通。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):353-357. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4878.
5
Physician Assessment of Pretest Probability of Malignancy and Adherence With Guidelines for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation.医生对恶性肿瘤的预测试概率评估以及对肺结节评估指南的遵循情况
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
Autoantibody Signature Enhances the Positive Predictive Power of Computed Tomography and Nodule-Based Risk Models for Detection of Lung Cancer.自身抗体特征增强了计算机断层扫描和基于结节的风险模型对肺癌检测的阳性预测能力。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Mar;12(3):578-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.143. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Resource use and guideline concordance in evaluation of pulmonary nodules for cancer: too much and too little care.评估肺癌结节时的资源利用和指南一致性：过度和不足的关注。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):871-80. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.561.
8
What do you mean, a spot?: A qualitative analysis of patients' reactions to discussions with their physicians about pulmonary nodules.你是什么意思，一个斑点？：对患者与医生讨论肺结节时反应的定性分析。
Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):672-677. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1095.
Zotero 插件