Paucar-Quishpe Valeria, Pérez-Otáñez Ximena, Rodríguez-Hidalgo Richar, Pérez-Escalante Cecilia, Cepeda-Bastidas Darío, Grijalva Jorge, Enríquez Sandra, Arciniegas-Ortega Susana, Vanwambeke Sophie O, Ron-Garrido Lenin, Saegerman Claude
Zoonosis Research Institute (CIZ) Central University of Ecuador Quito 170521Ecuador.
Research Unit of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Applied to Veterinary Science (UREAR-ULiège) Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH) Center Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Liege Liège 4000Belgium.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 May 24;2024:5023240. doi: 10.1155/2024/5023240. eCollection 2024.
The application of tick control strategies on tropical dairy cattle strongly relies on farmers' uptake, knowledge, and perceptions of the efficacy of control measures. This study aims to identify common and uncommon tick control practices employed by dairy farmers in subtropical areas of Ecuador and associate them with the presence of infestation and acaricide resistance. Data were collected through a cross-sectional survey and participatory meetings. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to explore the association between management variables and the level of tick infestation and resistance. It was determined that the main method of acaricide control is still chemical, mainly using spray baths. Generally, when this form of application is used, acaricides are overdosed, in contrast to the pour-on method with underdosage. Among the measures farmers adopt when chemical treatment has failed is to use overdoses of products, mix different acaricides, and use focused treatments (wipe cloth) with irritant substances. The absence of a high level of infestation was related to acaricide dips every 3-4 weeks and the use of intensive grazing. On the other hand, the high infestation was related to the use of organophosphates, wipe cloth application, and the report of tick-borne diseases (TBDs). A small group of farmers have good knowledge and seek alternatives to chemical control, experimenting with biological controls, herbal extracts, manual tick removal, and paddock control. Additionally, farmers reported the presence of TBDs (47%) and the presence of animals poisoned by acaricides (6%), which died in 75% of those cases. Farmers frequently mentioned that tick infestation induces milk drop production and weight loss and is associated with the presence of TBDs. This information is crucial to improve tick control management in Ecuador, particularly through implementing practices that mitigate resistance to acaricides and ensure long-term solutions that help maintain the efficacy of tick control treatments.
蜱虫控制策略在热带奶牛中的应用在很大程度上依赖于农民对控制措施效果的接受程度、了解程度和认知。本研究旨在确定厄瓜多尔亚热带地区奶农采用的常见和不常见的蜱虫控制做法,并将其与蜱虫侵扰和杀螨剂抗性的存在情况联系起来。通过横断面调查和参与式会议收集数据。使用多重对应分析来探讨管理变量与蜱虫侵扰和抗性水平之间的关联。结果表明,杀螨剂控制的主要方法仍然是化学方法,主要是使用喷淋池。一般来说,使用这种施用形式时,杀螨剂会过量使用,而浇泼法使用时则剂量不足。当化学处理失败时,农民采取的措施包括过量使用产品、混合不同的杀螨剂以及使用含有刺激性物质的集中处理(抹布擦拭)。蜱虫侵扰程度不高与每3至4周进行一次杀螨剂药浴以及采用集约放牧有关。另一方面,蜱虫侵扰程度高与有机磷的使用、抹布擦拭施用以及蜱传疾病(TBDs)的报告有关。一小部分农民有丰富的知识并寻求化学控制的替代方法,他们尝试生物控制、草药提取物、人工摘除蜱虫和牧场控制。此外,农民报告了蜱传疾病的存在(47%)以及杀螨剂中毒动物的存在(6%),其中75%的此类动物死亡。农民经常提到蜱虫侵扰会导致产奶量下降和体重减轻,并与蜱传疾病的存在有关。这些信息对于改善厄瓜多尔的蜱虫控制管理至关重要,特别是通过实施减轻对杀螨剂抗性的做法,并确保有助于维持蜱虫控制治疗效果的长期解决方案。