Research Center for Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Control (RTC), Department of Veterinary Pharmacy, Clinical and Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda; College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda; National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases (NRCPD), Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-Cho, Obihiro 080-8555, Hokkaido, Japan.
Research Center for Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Control (RTC), Department of Veterinary Pharmacy, Clinical and Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda; College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, P. O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018 Feb;9(2):254-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
The emergence of multi-acaricide resistant ticks has led to unprecedented level of acaricide failure in central and western Uganda. In the absence of a national acaricide resistance management strategy, the country's dairy sector is threatened by upsurge of ticks and tick-borne diseases. In this study, we developed a short-to-medium-term intervention approach called Evidence-Based Acaricide Tick Control (EBATIC): Identify, Test, Intervene and Eradicate (IT-IE). Furthermore, the perception of 199 farmers and extension workers, 12 key informants in four districts and 47 stakeholders in the animal industry in Uganda were assessed using semi-structured questionnaires. We report that the establishment of a specialized laboratory is pivotal in identifying and testing (IT) acaricide resistant ticks for prompt intervention and eradication (IE). The laboratory test results and the farm tick control gaps identified are very important in guiding acaricide resistance management strategies such as evidence-based acaricide rotation, development and dissemination of extension materials, training of farmers and extension workers, and stakeholders' engagement towards finding sustainable solutions. All the 47 stakeholders and 91.0% (181/199) of the farmers and extension workers reported that the EBATIC approach will help in solving the tick acaricide resistance crisis in Uganda. Similarly, all the 12 key informants and 92.5% (184/199) of the farmers and extension workers suggested that the EBATIC approach should be sustained and rolled out to other districts. The EBATIC stakeholders' dialogue generated both short-to-medium and long-term strategies for sustainable management of tick acaricide resistance in the country. Overall, the positive feedback from farmers, district veterinarians and stakeholders in the animal industry suggest that the EBATIC approach is a useful proof-of-concept on scalable intervention pathway against tick acaricide resistance in Uganda with possibility of adoption in other African countries.
抗多种杀螨剂蜱虫的出现导致乌干达中部和西部地区杀螨剂的使用出现了前所未有的失败。由于缺乏国家杀螨剂耐药性管理策略,该国的奶制品行业正受到蜱虫和蜱传疾病的威胁。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种称为基于证据的杀螨剂蜱控制(EBATIC)的短期至中期干预方法:识别、测试、干预和根除(IT-IE)。此外,我们使用半结构式问卷评估了乌干达 4 个地区的 199 名农民和推广人员、12 名关键信息提供者以及 47 名动物行业利益相关者的看法。我们报告说,建立一个专门的实验室对于识别和测试(IT)抗杀螨剂的蜱虫以进行及时干预和根除(IE)至关重要。实验室测试结果和农场蜱虫控制差距的确定对于指导杀螨剂耐药性管理策略非常重要,例如基于证据的杀螨剂轮换、推广材料的开发和传播、农民和推广人员的培训以及利益相关者的参与,以寻找可持续的解决方案。所有 47 名利益相关者和 91.0%(181/199)的农民和推广人员都报告说,EBATIC 方法将有助于解决乌干达的蜱虫杀螨剂耐药性危机。同样,所有 12 名关键信息提供者和 92.5%(184/199)的农民和推广人员都建议维持并向其他地区推广 EBATIC 方法。EBATIC 利益相关者的对话提出了可持续管理该国蜱虫杀螨剂耐药性的短期至中期和长期战略。总体而言,农民、地区兽医和动物行业利益相关者的积极反馈表明,EBATIC 方法是一种针对乌干达蜱虫杀螨剂耐药性的具有可扩展性的干预途径的有用概念验证,有可能在其他非洲国家采用。