Carvelli Andrea, Nardini Roberto, Carnio Azzurra, Ricci Ida, Rosone Francesca, Sala Marcello, Simeoni Sara, Maccarone Daniela, Scicluna Maria Teresa
Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana, M. Aleandri, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178, Rome, Italy.
WOAH Reference Laboratory for Equine Infectious Anaemia, Italian Reference Centre for Equine Infectious Anaemia, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana, M. Aleandri, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178, Rome, Italy.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Apr 30;2024:3439871. doi: 10.1155/2024/3439871. eCollection 2024.
Equine infectious anaemia (EIA) is a life-long viral infection affecting equids, transmitted mechanically by biting flies and iatrogenic means. Despite its global distribution, active surveillance is limited, with passive clinical surveillance or control of specific equine sectors prevailing. In Italy, a national surveillance plan in horse, donkey, and mule populations has been established and includes mandatory passive and active surveillance through annual serological tests. During 2007-2010, the agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test served as both screening and confirmatory tests. Since 2011, a three-tier diagnostic pathway was introduced, utilizing the ELISA test for screening, AGID as the confirmatory test, and the immunoblot test for cases where ELISA was positive and AGID was negative. From a total equid population of 406,000 animals, 1,337,899 samples were analysed during 2007-2012, with 2,348 (0.18%) testing positive. EIA seroprevalence significantly decreased across all the species/hybrids during the study period. EIA occurrence was higher in mules (IRR = 48.90) and lower in donkeys (IRR = 0.56) compared to horses. The holding seroprevalence was 1.15%. Spatial analysis revealed clusters of infection in central Italy. These findings demonstrate that active systematic surveillance effectively reduces EIA prevalence in equid populations. Mules and working horses in wooded areas appeared to be at higher risk of infection and act as EIA reservoirs. Surveillance and control should be maintained and strengthened in these species/hybrids and in these areas to effectively control EIA. Passive surveillance alone is insufficient to eradicate the disease, and EIA remains a constant threat for the equine industry if active control is not implemented.
马传染性贫血(EIA)是一种影响马科动物的终身性病毒感染,通过吸血蝇机械传播以及医源性途径传播。尽管其在全球范围内分布,但主动监测有限,主要是被动临床监测或对特定马科动物部门进行管控。在意大利,已制定针对马、驴和骡种群的国家监测计划,包括通过年度血清学检测进行强制性被动和主动监测。在2007 - 2010年期间,琼脂凝胶免疫扩散(AGID)试验用作筛查和确诊试验。自2011年起,引入了三级诊断途径,使用ELISA试验进行筛查,AGID作为确诊试验,对于ELISA呈阳性而AGID呈阴性的病例则采用免疫印迹试验。在2007 - 2012年期间,对总共406,000匹马科动物的1,337,899份样本进行了分析,其中2,348份(0.18%)检测呈阳性。在研究期间,所有物种/杂种的EIA血清阳性率均显著下降。与马相比,EIA在骡中的发生率较高(发病率比[IRR] = 48.90),在驴中较低(IRR = 0.56)。存栏血清阳性率为1.15%。空间分析显示意大利中部存在感染聚集区。这些发现表明,主动系统监测可有效降低马科动物种群中的EIA流行率。林区的骡和役用马似乎感染风险较高,并充当EIA的宿主。应在这些物种/杂种以及这些地区维持并加强监测和管控,以有效控制EIA。仅靠被动监测不足以根除该疾病,如果不实施主动防控,EIA对马产业仍然是持续的威胁。