Bahreman Nasreen, Dietrich Mary S, Jaser Sarah, Akard Foster Terrah, Mulvaney Shelagh
Towson University, Towson, USA.
School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Aug 23;2023:5597133. doi: 10.1155/2023/5597133. eCollection 2023.
Depression is a common comorbidity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). It is unclear if patterns of responses from questionnaires used to screen for depressive symptoms are influenced by the burden of living with T1D and/or the consequences of hyperglycemia. Based on this gap in the adolescent research, we sought to identify potential differences in depression screening response patterns between adolescents with and without T1D and relate response patterns with glycemic outcomes.
Using a retrospective case-control design, we analyzed electronic health records for age, sex, and race-matched adolescents 13-18 years of age from a pediatric diabetes clinic ( = 477) and a pediatric primary care clinic ( = 477) in the United States. Adolescents in both settings were screened for depressive symptoms during the same time period using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).
Participant demographics for matched characteristics were: 53.5% male, 71.7% White, median age 13.0 (interquartile range = 13.0, 14.0). After controlling for type of insurance, adolescents with T1D were more likely to have higher total PHQ-9 scores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.17, 1.98, = 0.002) and higher somatic subscores (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.20, 2.05, = 0.001) compared to the primary care sample. The pattern of item endorsement greater than "not at all" indicated that adolescents with T1D were more likely to have higher values for somatic items such as "trouble falling asleep" and "feeling tired" than those in the primary care sample. Item-total correlations and Cronbach's indicated that all items were contributing to the overall score in the same manner in each group.
Symptom endorsement for sleep and fatigue were higher for adolescents with T1D and without T1D. Study results support the need for further examination of the origins of somatic symptoms in T1D and for an additional examination of the specificity of depression screening instruments used in routine pediatric diabetes care.
抑郁症是1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年中常见的合并症。尚不清楚用于筛查抑郁症状的问卷的回答模式是否受T1D生活负担和/或高血糖后果的影响。基于青少年研究中的这一空白,我们试图确定患有和未患有T1D的青少年在抑郁筛查反应模式上的潜在差异,并将反应模式与血糖结果相关联。
采用回顾性病例对照设计,我们分析了美国一家儿科糖尿病诊所(n = 477)和一家儿科初级保健诊所(n = 477)中年龄、性别和种族匹配的13 - 18岁青少年的电子健康记录。在同一时期,使用患者健康问卷9(PHQ - 9)对两个诊所的青少年进行抑郁症状筛查。
匹配特征的参与者人口统计学数据为:53.5%为男性,71.7%为白人,中位年龄13.0(四分位间距 = 13.0,14.0)。在控制保险类型后,与初级保健样本相比,患有T1D的青少年更有可能有更高的PHQ - 9总分(优势比(OR)= 1.51,95%置信区间 = 1.17,1.98,P = 0.002)和更高的躯体亚评分(OR = 1.57,95%置信区间 = 1.20,2.05,P = 0.001)。大于“完全没有”的项目认可模式表明,与初级保健样本中的青少年相比,患有T1D的青少年在诸如“入睡困难”和“感觉疲倦”等躯体项目上更有可能有更高的值。项目 - 总分相关性和克朗巴哈α系数表明,每组中所有项目对总分的贡献方式相同。
患有和未患有T1D的青少年在睡眠和疲劳症状认可方面都较高。研究结果支持需要进一步检查T1D中躯体症状的起源,以及对常规儿科糖尿病护理中使用的抑郁筛查工具的特异性进行额外检查。