Lloyd-Jones David J, Muamedi Musaji, Spottiswoode Claire N
FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town South Africa.
Mbamba Village, Niassa Special Reserve, Niassa Province Mozambique.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 28;15(4):e71136. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71136. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Greater honeyguides () are well known to guide human honey hunters to wild bees' nests in exchange for beeswax as food. Centuries of African Indigenous accounts have intriguingly reported that honeyguides occasionally guide humans to animals other than bees, typically large animals dangerous to humans. This is interpreted by some human cultures as punishment for prior failure to reward the bird, and by others as an altruistic warning behavior. Here, we present quantitative evidence from hundreds of honeyguide-human interactions in Mozambique of greater honeyguides guiding humans to snakes ( = 3) and a dead mammal ( = 1). We show that guiding behavior to these vertebrates was (i) spatially and acoustically analogous to honeyguide behavior when guiding to bees, (ii) did not occur more frequently after not being rewarded with beeswax by humans, and (iii) was rare (3.7% of human-honeyguide interactions in 1 year; 0% in others). We review historical accounts and cultural explanations for this behavior and use these to inform five hypotheses for why honeyguides guide people to nonbee animals. Our field data were most consistent with the hypothesis that guiding to nonbee animals results from a cognitive recall error of spatial information. We suggest that this behavior is unlikely to function as punishment, yet may coincidentally benefit honeyguides over longer timescales by initiating a human cultural interpretation that reinforces human cultural traditions of rewarding honeyguides with beeswax.
大响蜜鴷(Greater honeyguides)以引导人类蜂蜜采集者找到野生蜂巢以换取蜂蜡作为食物而闻名。几个世纪以来,非洲原住民的记载有趣地报告说,响蜜鴷偶尔会引导人类找到蜜蜂以外的动物,通常是对人类有危险的大型动物。一些人类文化将此解释为对之前未奖励该鸟类的惩罚,而另一些文化则将其视为一种利他的警告行为。在这里,我们提供了来自莫桑比克数百次响蜜鴷与人类互动的定量证据,表明大响蜜鴷引导人类找到了蛇(n = 3)和一只死哺乳动物(n = 1)。我们发现,引导人类找到这些脊椎动物的行为(i)在空间和声学上与引导人类找到蜜蜂时的响蜜鴷行为相似,(ii)在未得到人类蜂蜡奖励后并没有更频繁地发生这种行为,并且(iii)这种情况很罕见(在1年中占响蜜鴷与人类互动的3.7%;在其他年份为0%)。我们回顾了关于这种行为的历史记载和文化解释,并以此为基础提出了五个关于响蜜鴷为何引导人类找到非蜜蜂动物的假设。我们的实地数据与引导人类找到非蜜蜂动物是由于空间信息的认知回忆错误这一假设最为一致。我们认为这种行为不太可能起到惩罚作用,但从较长时间尺度来看可能会偶然地使响蜜鴷受益,因为它引发了一种人类文化解读,强化了人类用蜂蜡奖励响蜜鴷的文化传统。