Allen Alina M, Lazarus Jeffrey V, Alkhouri Naim, Noureddin Mazen, Wong Vincent Wai-Sun, Tsochatzis Emmanuel A, de Avila Leyla, Racila Andrei, Nader Fatema, Mark Henry E, Henry Linda, Stepanova Maria, Castera Laurent, Younossi Zobair M
The Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Apr 30;9(5). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000678. eCollection 2025 May 1.
Noninvasive tests (NITs) are used to risk-stratify metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The aim was to survey global patterns of real-world use of NITs.
A 38-item survey was designed by the Global NASH Council. Providers were asked about risks for advanced fibrosis, which NITs (cutoff values) they use to risk-stratify liver disease, monitor progression, and which professional guidelines they follow.
A total of 321 participants from 43 countries completed the survey (54% hepatologists, 28% gastroenterologists, and 18% other). Of the respondents, 85% would risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity (82%), or abnormal liver enzymes (73%). Among NITs to rule out significant or advanced fibrosis, transient elastography (TE) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were most used, followed by NAFLD Fibrosis Score, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, and magnetic resonance elastography. The cutoffs for ruling out significant fibrosis varied considerably between practices and from guidelines, with only 50% using TE <8 kPa, 65% using FIB-4 <1.30 for age <65, and 41% using FIB-4 <2.00 for age ≥65. Similar variability was found for ruling in advanced fibrosis, where thresholds of FIB-4 ≥2.67 and TE ≥10 kPa were used by 20% and 17%, respectively. To establish advanced fibrosis, 48% would use 2 NITs while 23% would consider 1 NIT, and 17% would confirm with liver biopsy. TE was used by >75% to monitor, and 66% would monitor (intermediate or high risk) annually. Finally, 65% follow professional guideline recommendations regarding NITs.
In clinical practice, there is variability in NIT use and their thresholds. Additionally, there is suboptimal adherence to professional societies' guidelines.
非侵入性检测(NITs)用于对代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病进行风险分层。目的是调查NITs在现实世界中的全球使用模式。
全球非酒精性脂肪性肝炎理事会设计了一项包含38个条目的调查问卷。询问医疗服务提供者关于晚期纤维化的风险、他们用于对肝病进行风险分层和监测疾病进展的NITs(临界值),以及他们遵循的专业指南。
来自43个国家的321名参与者完成了调查(54%为肝病学家,28%为胃肠病学家,18%为其他)。在受访者中,85%会对2型糖尿病、肥胖(82%)或肝酶异常(73%)的患者进行风险分层。在用于排除显著或晚期纤维化的NITs中,瞬时弹性成像(TE)和纤维化-4(FIB-4)使用最为频繁,其次是NAFLD纤维化评分、增强肝纤维化和磁共振弹性成像。排除显著纤维化的临界值在不同医疗机构之间以及与指南之间存在很大差异,只有50%的机构使用TE<8 kPa,65%的机构在年龄<65岁时使用FIB-4<1.30,41%的机构在年龄≥65岁时使用FIB-4<2.00。在诊断晚期纤维化方面也发现了类似的变异性,分别有20%和17%的机构使用FIB-4≥2.67和TE≥10 kPa的临界值。为了确诊晚期纤维化,48%的机构会使用2种NITs,而23%的机构会考虑使用1种NITs,17%的机构会通过肝活检进行确认。超过75%的机构使用TE进行监测,66%的机构会每年进行监测(中度或高风险)。最后,65%的机构遵循关于NITs的专业指南建议。
在临床实践中,NITs的使用及其临界值存在差异。此外,对专业学会指南的遵循情况也不理想。