Planas R F, McBrayer R H, Koen P A
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985 Jul;59(1):269-73. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1985.59.1.269.
Diaphragmatic force, determined by stimulating the phrenic nerve while simultaneously measuring the pressures in a closed respiratory system, was assessed in five anesthetized dogs over a 5-h period to evaluate the inherent variability of this technique. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was measured at functional residual capacity during stimulation (120 Hz, 0.2-ms duration) of one phrenic nerve by either direct phrenic nerve stimulation (DPNS) or transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS). An analysis of variance showed no significant (P greater than 0.50) change during the 5-h period. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.94, P less than 0.001) between Pdi obtained by TPNS and that obtained by DPNS. It is concluded that either DPNS or TPNS can be used to evaluate diaphragmatic strength over a 5-h period and that TPNS can be used in lieu of DPNS.
通过在封闭呼吸系统中同时测量压力的情况下刺激膈神经来测定膈肌力量,在5小时内对5只麻醉犬进行评估,以评价该技术的内在变异性。在一侧膈神经通过直接膈神经刺激(DPNS)或经静脉膈神经刺激(TPNS)进行刺激(120Hz,持续时间0.2ms)时,于功能残气量下测量跨膈压(Pdi)。方差分析显示在5小时期间无显著(P>0.50)变化。TPNS获得的Pdi与DPNS获得的Pdi之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.94,P<0.001)。得出的结论是,DPNS或TPNS均可用于在5小时内评估膈肌力量,且TPNS可替代DPNS使用。