• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在至少5年的随访中,确定用于治疗盂肱关节炎或肩袖撕裂关节病的反肩关节置换术后最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。

Defining the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state following reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis or cuff tear arthropathy at minimum 5-year follow-up.

作者信息

Berreta Rodrigo Saad, Khan Zeeshan A, Jan Kyleen, Villarreal-Espinosa Juan Bernardo, Rubin Jared, Lee Cadence, Harkin William, Scanaliato John P, Garrigues Grant E, Nicholson Gregory P, Cole Brian J, Verma Nikhil N

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.022
PMID:40306357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While prior studies have assessed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) at 2-year follow-up, data on clinically significant outcomes at mid-term follow-up remain limited.

PURPOSE

(1) To establish the MCID and PASS thresholds for rTSA with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. (2) To examine factors that are predictive of MCID and PASS achievement for rTSA, including preoperative, demographic, and intraoperative variables.

METHODS

All patients who underwent rTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy or glenohumeral arthritis from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively identified through a prospectively-collected institutional database. MCID thresholds were determined by a distribution-based method while PASS thresholds were established using an anchor-based method. The patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyzed included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score and Veterans Rand (VR) 12. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine factors associated with the achievement of MCID and PASS.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The thresholds for MCID achievement and percentages that reached achievement were as follows: ASES, 11.4 (88.8%); SANE, 14.8 (85.0%); VR 12 Physical, 4.9 (66.3%). The thresholds for PASS achievement and percentages that reached achievement were as follows: ASES, 80.8 (65.0%); SANE, 75.9 (66.3%); VR 12 Physical, 44.4 (57.5%). Lower preoperative score was predictive of achieving MCID for all PROMs. Worker's compensation designation was predictive of failing to achieve MCID for ASES and MCID and PASS for SANE. A prior ipsilateral shoulder procedure was predictive of failing to achieve MCID for ASES, SANE, and VR 12 Physical. Tobacco use was predictive of failing to achieve MCID for VR 12 Physical.

CONCLUSION

This study defines the thresholds for MCID and PASS achievement at minimum 5-year follow-up in a cohort of patients undergoing rTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy or glenohumeral arthritis. More patients achieved MCID than PASS for all PROMs, and lower preoperative scores were predictive of the achievement of MCID. Additionally, factors such as worker's compensation designation, prior surgical history of the ipsilateral shoulder, and tobacco use were found to be predictive of failing to achieve MCID and PASS at mid-term follow-up.

摘要

背景

虽然先前的研究已经评估了反向肩关节置换术(rTSA)术后2年随访时的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS),但中期随访时临床显著结果的数据仍然有限。

目的

(1)确定随访期至少为5年的rTSA的MCID和PASS阈值。(2)研究预测rTSA达到MCID和PASS的因素,包括术前、人口统计学和术中变量。

方法

通过前瞻性收集的机构数据库,回顾性确定2016年1月至2018年12月期间因肩袖关节病或盂肱关节炎接受rTSA的所有患者。MCID阈值采用基于分布的方法确定,而PASS阈值采用基于锚定的方法确定。分析的患者报告结局指标(PROMs)包括美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、单项评估数字评定(SANE)评分和退伍军人兰德(VR)12量表。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定与达到MCID和PASS相关的因素。

结果

纳入80例患者。达到MCID的阈值及达到该阈值的百分比如下:ASES评分,11.4(88.8%);SANE评分,14.8(85.0%);VR 12量表身体功能部分,4.9(66.3%)。达到PASS的阈值及达到该阈值的百分比如下:ASES评分,80.8(65.0%);SANE评分,75.9(66.3%);VR 12量表身体功能部分,44.4(57.5%)。术前较低的评分可预测所有PROMs达到MCID。工伤赔偿认定可预测ASES评分未达到MCID以及SANE评分未达到MCID和PASS。同侧肩部既往手术可预测ASES评分、SANE评分和VR 12量表身体功能部分未达到MCID。吸烟可预测VR 12量表身体功能部分未达到MCID。

结论

本研究定义了一组因肩袖关节病或盂肱关节炎接受rTSA的患者在至少5年随访时达到MCID和PASS的阈值。所有PROMs中,达到MCID的患者比达到PASS的患者更多,术前较低的评分可预测达到MCID。此外,发现工伤赔偿认定、同侧肩部既往手术史和吸烟等因素可预测在中期随访时未达到MCID和PASS。

相似文献

1
Defining the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state following reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis or cuff tear arthropathy at minimum 5-year follow-up.在至少5年的随访中,确定用于治疗盂肱关节炎或肩袖撕裂关节病的反肩关节置换术后最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.022.
2
Does the Relationship Between Preoperative Function and Achievement of Clinically Important Benchmarks of Success After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Depend on Outcome Assessment Design?全肩关节置换术后术前功能与临床重要成功指标之间的关系是否取决于结果评估设计?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):377-395. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003347. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.关节镜下后盂唇修补术治疗后肩盂肱不稳后,确立最小临床重要差异、显著临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):207-214. doi: 10.1177/03635465231210289.
4
Effect of age and gender in rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptom state 2 years after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction.关节镜下上盂唇重建术后2年,年龄和性别对达到最小临床重要差异及患者可接受症状状态发生率的影响。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Apr;32(4):1038-1048. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12128. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
5
Clinically significant outcome thresholds and rates of achievement by shoulder arthroplasty type and preoperative diagnosis.按肩关节置换类型和术前诊断分类的临床显著结局阈值和达成率。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1448-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.023. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?美国肩肘外科医生评分的何种变化代表着肩关节置换术后具有临床意义的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2672-2681. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
7
Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜肩袖修复术后达到临床显著结果所需的时间。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;48(14):3447-3453. doi: 10.1177/0363546520962512. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.量化首次翻修反式全肩关节置换术后的成功:最小临床重要差异、实质性临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):e516-e527. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 11.
9
Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed for glenohumeral arthritis: does glenoid morphology matter?针对盂肱关节炎进行的初次反向全肩关节置换术:关节盂形态重要吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜肩袖修复术后的最小临床重要差异、显著临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;48(11):2650-2659. doi: 10.1177/0363546520943862. Epub 2020 Aug 19.