Alawadhi Ahmed, Jenkins David, Palin Victoria, van Staa Tjeerd
Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Health Information Management Program, Oman College of Health Sciences, Muscat, Oman.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 30;15(4):e093562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093562.
Missed hospital appointments are common among outpatients and have significant clinical and economic consequences. The purpose of this study is to develop a predictive model of missed hospital appointments and to evaluate different overbooking strategies.
Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.
Outpatient clinics of the Royal Hospital in Muscat, Oman.
All outpatient clinic appointments scheduled between January 2014 and February 2021 (n=947 364).
Predictive models were created using logistic regression for the entire cohort and individual practices to predict missed hospital appointments. The performance of the models was evaluated using a holdout set. Simulations were performed to compare the effectiveness of predictive model-based overbooking and organisational overbooking in optimising appointment utilisation.
Of the 947 364 outpatient appointments booked, 201 877 (21.3%) were missed. The proportion of missed appointments varied by clinic, ranging from 13.8% in oncology to 28.3% in urology. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the overall predictive model was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.768 to 0.775), while the AUC for the clinic-specific predictive model was 0.845 (95% CI: 0.836 to 0.855) for oncology and 0.738 (95% CI: 0.732 to 0.744) for paediatrics. The overbooking strategy based on the predictive model outperformed systematic overbooking, with shortages of available appointments at 10.4% in oncology and 25.0% in gastroenterology.
Predictive models can effectively estimate the probability of missing a hospital appointment with high accuracy. Using these models to guide overbooking strategies can enable better appointment scheduling without burdening clinics and reduce the impact of missed appointments.
门诊患者错过医院预约的情况很常见,且会产生重大的临床和经济后果。本研究的目的是建立一个错过医院预约的预测模型,并评估不同的超额预约策略。
回顾性横断面分析。
阿曼马斯喀特皇家医院的门诊诊所。
2014年1月至2021年2月期间安排的所有门诊预约(n = 947364)。
使用逻辑回归为整个队列和各个科室建立预测模型,以预测错过医院预约的情况。使用一个保留集评估模型的性能。进行模拟以比较基于预测模型的超额预约和组织性超额预约在优化预约利用方面的有效性。
在947364个预约的门诊预约中,有201877个(21.3%)被错过。错过预约的比例因科室而异,从肿瘤学的13.8%到泌尿外科的28.3%不等。总体预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.771(95%CI:0.768至0.775),而肿瘤学科室特定预测模型的AUC为0.845(95%CI:0.836至0.855),儿科学科室特定预测模型的AUC为0.738(95%CI:0.732至0.744)。基于预测模型的超额预约策略优于系统性超额预约,肿瘤学科室可用预约短缺率为10.4%,胃肠病学科室为25.0%。
预测模型可以有效地高精度估计错过医院预约的概率。使用这些模型指导超额预约策略可以在不增加科室负担的情况下实现更好的预约安排,并减少错过预约的影响。