Banovetz Mark T, Braaten Jacob A, Homan Morgan D, Kennedy Nicholas I, LaPrade Robert F
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Video J Sports Med. 2024 Mar 1;4(2):26350254231204641. doi: 10.1177/26350254231204641. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.
Fibular collateral ligament (FCL) injuries commonly present in a multiligament knee injury pattern. These injuries are associated with significant instability leading to altered tibiofemoral biomechanics and therefore require surgical intervention. Similarly, grade 3 posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries may disrupt normal tibiofemoral and patellofemoral biomechanics and increase the risk of secondary osteoarthritis. Therefore, concomitant reconstruction of the FCL and PCL should be performed to decrease knee laxity and optimize functional outcomes.
Early operative treatment is indicated for patients with combined grade 3 FCL injuries and complete PCL tears. Contraindications to this procedure include patients who have significant osteoarthritis, open knee dislocations, or medical comorbidities making them unfit for surgery.
The fundamental idea behind this technique is a stepwise treatment starting with open aspects of the procedure and followed by arthroscopic work.The technique is initiated with a lateral approach, common peroneal neurolysis, fibular and femoral FCL reconstruction tunnel preparation, and a gracilis or semitendinosus tendon autograft harvest. After that, focus shifts to intra-articular work such as associated meniscal assessment and treatment, PCL femoral and tibial tunnel preparation, graft passage, and PCL femoral tunnel fixation. Final graft fixation order is as follows: anterolateral bundle of PCL, posteromedial bundle of PCL, and finally FCL.
Multiple studies have reported that an anatomic FCL reconstruction in the setting of multiligament injury results in improved patient outcomes. In a prospective study of 20 patients, LaPrade et al reported -0.4 mm difference in side-to-side lateral compartment gapping and significant postoperative improvement of symptom and functional scores at a minimum 2 year postoperative follow-up after anatomic reconstruction of the FCL. Similarly, Moulton et al reported significant improvement in the average Western Ontario and Lysholm scores at 2.7 years follow-up. LaPrade et al also reported significant improvement in function and objective outcome scores at 3 years' follow-up from anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction.
Anatomic FCL and PCL reconstructions successfully restore near native knee objective stability and provide superior clinical outcomes when compared to nonanatomic-based FCL reconstructions that continue to be performed.
The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
腓侧副韧带(FCL)损伤常见于膝关节多韧带损伤模式中。这些损伤会导致明显的不稳定,进而改变胫股生物力学,因此需要手术干预。同样,3级后交叉韧带(PCL)损伤可能会破坏正常的胫股和髌股生物力学,并增加继发性骨关节炎的风险。因此,应同时进行FCL和PCL重建,以减少膝关节松弛并优化功能结果。
适用于3级FCL损伤合并PCL完全撕裂的患者进行早期手术治疗。该手术的禁忌症包括患有严重骨关节炎、开放性膝关节脱位或有内科合并症而不适合手术的患者。
该技术背后的基本理念是从手术的开放部分开始,然后进行关节镜操作的分步治疗。该技术首先采用外侧入路、腓总神经松解、制备腓骨和股骨FCL重建隧道,并采集股薄肌或半腱肌自体肌腱。之后,重点转向关节内操作,如相关半月板评估和治疗、PCL股骨和胫骨隧道制备、移植物植入以及PCL股骨隧道固定。最终移植物固定顺序如下:PCL前外侧束、PCL后内侧束,最后是FCL。
多项研究报告称,在多韧带损伤情况下进行解剖学FCL重建可改善患者预后。在一项对20例患者的前瞻性研究中,LaPrade等人报告,在FCL解剖重建后至少2年的术后随访中,两侧外侧间室间隙差异为-0.4mm,症状和功能评分有显著的术后改善。同样,Moulton等人报告在2.7年随访时,西安大略和Lysholm平均评分有显著改善。LaPrade等人还报告在解剖学双束PCL重建3年随访时,功能和客观结果评分有显著改善。
与仍在进行的非解剖学FCL重建相比,解剖学FCL和PCL重建成功恢复了接近天然膝关节的客观稳定性,并提供了更好的临床结果。
作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果个体可能被识别,作者已随本提交发表的文章附上患者的豁免声明或其他书面批准形式。